dark-pattern-reviewlisted

# Dark pattern review Finds where an interface gets a user to do something they would not choose with clear information and a real choice, and says what to change. The standard is the user's informed intent, not conversion. This skill owns manipulation and consent findings. Accessibility belongs to `better-accessibility`, wording quality to `better-writing`, and the general review verdict to `better-interface` or `product-design-review` when they are driving. It is a design review, not legal advice: it flags exposure so a lawyer can look, it never clears a flow. ## Inputs - The flow as it will ship: screenshots, a prototype, or source with copy. Every step, including confirmation emails and the cancel path. - The business context: what the flow is optimizing for, and what is mandatory (age gates, regulated disclosures). - Jurisdictions that matter, if known (EU, UK, US states, others). ## Workflow ### 1. Inventory the decision points List every moment where the user's choice or attention is acted on: consent (cookies, tracking, marketing), account creation, plan selection, price display, add-ons, checkout, trial start, renewal, cancellation, data sharing, notification permissions, review prompts. For each, record the default state, the options shown, the effort of each option, and what the copy says. ### 2. Check each point against the taxonomy Read [references/taxonomy.md](references/taxonomy.md) for the pattern list with detection questions. The families, in th