vibe.prioritization

# Prioritization Frameworks Reference ## Done Criteria - [ ] 선택한 framework와 선택 근거가 기록되어 있다. - [ ] 모든 평가 대상에 framework의 필수 입력값이 있다. - [ ] 정의된 산식으로 점수가 계산되어 있다. - [ ] 최종 정렬 순서와 동점 처리 기준이 명시되어 있다. > Based on the Product Frameworks Compendium from [Product Compass](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium) by Pawel Huryn (MIT License). A reference guide to help you select and apply the right prioritization framework for your context. ## Core Principle Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize **problems (opportunities)**, not features. ## Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, *The Lean Product Playbook*) The recommended framework for prioritizing customer problems. Survey customers on **Importance** and **Satisfaction** for each need (normalize to 0-1 scale). Three related formulas: - **Current value** = Importance x Satisfaction - **Opportunity Score** = Importance x (1 - Satisfaction) - **Customer value created** = Importance x (S2 - S1), where S1 = satisfaction before, S2 = satisfaction after High Importance + low Satisfaction = highest Opportunity Score = best opportunities. Plot on an Importance vs Satisfaction chart — upper-left quadrant is the sweet spot. ## ICE Framework Useful for prioritizing initiatives and ideas. Considers not only value but also risk and economic factors. - **I** (Impact) = Opportunity Score x Number of Customers affected - **C** (Confidence) = How confident are we? (1-10). Accounts for risk. - **E** (Ease) ...