← ClaudeAtlas

nature-reviewerlisted

Simulate Nature-style or general pre-submission peer review from the referee perspective, not an author rebuttal. Use for reviewer reports, mock peer review, manuscript critique, novelty/significance/technical-soundness assessment, 审稿人视角评估, 模拟审稿, 预审, 投稿前自审, 审稿意见模拟, or 帮我审一下论文. Produce evidence-grounded Major Concerns, Minor Comments, and blocking flags. For multiple reviewers, keep every reviewer mutually blind in a separate context, freeze all reports before comparison, and create any synthesis only afterward as a separate editor/author-facing artifact.
szzjayson25-hub/nature-academic-skills · ★ 0 · Code & Development · score 70
Install: claude install-skill szzjayson25-hub/nature-academic-skills
# Nature Reviewer Assessment Skill ## Additional configured journals For Applied Soft Computing (ASC), Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence (EAAI), ISA Transactions, Knowledge-Based Systems (KBS), Measurement, Neurocomputing, or IEEE Transactions on Reliability, use `../nature-shared/journal-formats/index.md` to resolve the exact journal. Preserve this skill’s task workflow and evidence safeguards. Apply only the selected reference’s relevant scope; do not impose flagship-Nature significance or import another journal’s numerical, citation, or production defaults. These seven profiles do not yet establish verified official submission limits; verify the target’s current official source when such requirements affect work. ## ESWA journal context When the target is Expert Systems with Applications (`ESWA` or `Expert Syst. Appl.`, case-insensitive), read `../nature-shared/journal-formats/eswa.md` before applying journal-specific defaults. Use the shared contract for journal authority in place of flagship-Nature publication criteria, and `../nature-shared/core/eswa-ml-rul-style.md` for applicable ML/RUL assessment lenses. Assess applied-system fit, substantive contribution and technical evidence without requiring Nature-level broad interest. Label output criteria as ESWA; keep reviewer isolation, evidence pointers and Major/Minor rules. The simulated reviewer count is a local choice, not ESWA policy. Pass the ESWA contract with the same immutable source packet to