← ClaudeAtlas

build-research-paperlisted

Cross-domain / Scientific writing and publication — Build beautifully-formatted, arxiv-ready research paper PDFs from a mix of hand-authored LaTeX and/or markdown + PNG figures, using `tectonic` (default) or `pandoc` (escape hatch). Captures the reusable pattern that research projects keep re-discovering: `report/main.tex` + `references.bib` + `generate_figures.py` + iterative feedback/response scaffolding, all buildable with a single command. WHEN: write a research paper, arxiv submission, prepub, generate PDF from markdown, LaTeX paper, build main.tex, journal manuscript, referee revision, response to referee, resubmission package, publication-quality figures, matplotlib publication style, tectonic build, pandoc build, generate arxiv-ready PDF, bibliography from BibTeX.
timothymeyers/discovery-tools · ★ 1 · Web & Frontend · score 70
Install: claude install-skill timothymeyers/discovery-tools
# build-research-paper — Research Paper Builder Skill Turn a project's results + figures + notes into a **publication-quality, arxiv-ready PDF**. This skill captures a pattern re-discovered across many research projects, distilled into two build paths: a LaTeX-first path (`tectonic`, the default) and a Markdown-first path (`pandoc`, the escape hatch). ## First: a paper is a paper Read this before touching `main.tex`, and re-read it before declaring done. Everything below is tooling. **This is the point.** **A paper is a document a human being reads, front to back, to learn something they did not know.** That is the whole definition. Not a compliance artifact. Not a results dump. Not a receipt proving work occurred. Not a serialization of a task tree. It follows that: - **The paper has a thesis** — a story the data is telling. If you cannot say in one sentence what this paper found, it is not ready, regardless of how many sections exist. Write that sentence down before you write anything else. - **The reader is a domain expert, not a validator.** They came for the finding. They will grant that you did the work carefully if you *show* them it holds; they will not read twenty pages of proof that it does before being told what "it" is. - **Figures carry the argument.** A picture shows shape; a table files values. A data-analysis paper with no charts has not been written, only assembled. - **Rigor is the warrant, not the subject.** Provenance, validation, failure