example-checklistlisted

# example-checklist The second skill in the same domain. It exists to show why a plugin is needed at all: producing and checking are different procedures, but one subject area, one vocabulary and one set of templates. ## When it applies - The artefact is finished and has to be checked against formal criteria before it is handed on. ## When it does not apply - The artefact does not exist yet — start with `example-procedure`. - The ask is to rewrite the text, not to find holes in it. - Someone wants a subjective "is this good" verdict — this skill checks against criteria, not taste. ## Procedure 1. Read the artefact and reconstruct how it was built: what the inputs were, which features were used, what coverage is claimed. 2. Work through the criteria below and give a verdict on each, anchored to a place in the artefact. 3. Return findings ordered by severity. If there are none, say so plainly — do not manufacture findings for volume. ## Criteria | Criterion | What to look for | |---|---| | Traceability | every claim reduces to a specific source | | Honest coverage | what was left out and why; the unreachable is named as unreachable | | Gaps | empty values are shown as empty, not filled with plausible text | | Substitution | a model conclusion is not presented as a result derived from data | | Reproducibility | the description is enough to repeat the run and get the same result | ## Quality gates - Every finding points at a place in the artefact. - Findings are not in