akcli-schematic-reviewlisted

# akcli-schematic-review — a severity-ranked schematic review protocol on top of `akcli` This skill is the **review protocol**: what to run, in what order, how to interpret the caveats, which electrical checks the tool cannot do for you, and how to write the report. For basic `akcli` mechanics (input formats, read/analyze/draw usage, config discovery, exit codes, error format) **see the akcli-circuit-design skill** — do not re-derive them here. A review is **strictly read-only**. Never modify the schematic under review, and never "fix" it to match an expected table — report the divergence instead. ## Review doctrine - **Evidence or it didn't happen.** Every finding — and every "checked, OK" — must cite the exact `akcli` command you ran and paste the relevant output line(s). Never assert a defect or a pass from memory or from reading the file listing alone. - **"0 findings" is not "clean".** Read the metadata header `check` prints (passive-pin ratio, No-ERC suppressed count, unnamed-net count, frac coords) before concluding anything. - **The schematic is authoritative; expected tables and datasheet notes are advisory.** - **Confidence is part of the finding.** `review` findings carry an explicit confidence: `deterministic` (recomputable geometry/math — trust it), `datasheet_backed` (carries the PDF sha256+page — trust it, cite the page), `heuristic` (name/prefix inference — YOU adjudicate before reporting above Minor), `llm_reviewed` (an accepted observation