review-spec
SolidReview a specification document: launches an internal spec review and `/peer-review` in parallel and returns combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my spec", "review this spec", "check my spec", "critique my spec", or wants spec feedback before planning.
Install
Quality Score: 89/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- tobihagemann
- Repository
- tobihagemann/turbo
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
creview-spec
Multi-agent adversarial review of a spec. Spawns red team, assumptions auditor, testability auditor, design contract checker, and UX auditor. Use after /cspec or /cmodel.
review-spec
Use after implementing tasks or mid-feature to verify code matches design docs and ensure they are in sync. Detects spec deviations, missing implementations, doc inconsistencies, and outdated docs in design and implementation documentation.
go-spec-reviewer
Review design specification documents for Go programs before implementation begins. Use this skill when a user has a Go spec to review, wants feedback on a design doc, is about to start implementing from a spec, asks "is this spec ready?", or wants a technical review of a planned feature in a Go codebase. Applies Go philosophy — simplicity, composition, explicit errors, context propagation — plus Cobra/Viper CLI conventions where applicable.
review-spec
This skill should be used for SPEC.md artifact reviewer — validates spec quality against the SB spec template: required sections, non-empty overview, user story format, testable acceptance criteria, assumption completeness, and frontmatter fields
creview
Skeptically review a spec for unstated assumptions, untestable rules, missing edge cases, security gaps, and UX failures. Run after /cspec.