double-check-alignlisted

# this skill Recovery for a broken double-check. The chat currently holds a revision log — verdicts about prior claims, deltas against text the user never read. Replace it with the analysis itself. Read `references/verification-contract.md` first — it is the contract this command restores. ## `$ARGUMENTS` - Empty — re-anchor on the subject of the most recent analysis thread, at its original scope. - A topic or question — re-anchor on that instead. Narrowing is a feature: it discards the earlier answer's scaffolding, which is what lets omitted items finally surface. ## Steps 1. **Recover the request.** From the conversation, reconstruct the original question and every constraint the user has added since — including corrections they made that you agreed with. User turns are binding context; your own answer turns are not. 2. **Quarantine prior answers.** Everything you previously concluded is untrusted until re-verified against source. Do not reuse prior numbering, category names, or verdict framing. 3. **Re-derive and restate.** Re-open the source artifacts and write the full analysis, standalone, in the shape the original request implied. Every claim stated positively and in full — no verdict shorthand, no "as noted above", no delta table. 4. **Weakness inline.** If a claim is weak, say why it is weak. Never say it was previously stated differently. ## What this does not do - Reference, summarize, or grade the earlier response — the use