review-gatelisted

Review the working diff (or the changes since a fixed point) through independent **finder** angles, judge every candidate with an independent **verifier**, and report a ranked, capped findings list. Finders find and verifiers judge — a finder never drops a candidate it half-believes; silently dropped candidates bypass verification and are the dominant cause of missed bugs. ## Arguments The effort level is whichever of `low`, `medium`, or `high` appears among the arguments; default `medium`. `--fix`, anywhere in the arguments, enables apply mode (see Synthesize and report) on the `medium` and `high` pipelines; `low` and the no-sub-agent fallback report their findings and apply nothing, since neither ran a verifier over them. A run handed a `--fix` it cannot honour says so in its summary, so a report with no applied outcomes never reads as nothing having been worth applying. `--loop`, anywhere in the arguments, implies `--fix` and drives that apply mode to a defined green state instead of reporting once — read [LOOP.md](LOOP.md) before Scope and run the whole gate under its rules. What remains once the level and the flags are taken out is the fixed point. | Level | Pipeline | Bias | Findings cap | | -------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------ | | `low` | 1 in