adversarial-reviewlisted

# Adversarial Review Review a change-set with a two-stage multi-agent pipeline: **find** (parallel read-only reviewers, each owning one failure dimension) then **verify** (an independent skeptic per finding, prompted to refute it). Only findings that survive verification are reported. This kills the two classic failure modes of LLM review: plausible-but-wrong findings, and one reviewer trying to hold every concern at once. This skill authorizes use of the Workflow tool for the orchestration. ## 1. Establish scope (cheap, inline) - Default: the working tree — `git diff HEAD --stat` plus `git status --short` for untracked files. If the tree is clean, use commits ahead of the default branch (`git log origin/main..HEAD`); if none, the last commit. - If args name a base ref, PR number (`gh pr diff <n> --stat`), or paths, scope to that instead. - Build a SCOPE block: repo path, the changed-file list grouped by feature/area if discernible (read the recent commit messages), and one line of context per group ("X was just implemented by engineer A who did not know about Y"). If several independent changes landed in sequence, SAY SO in the scope — it unlocks the seams dimension. - Note anything reviewers must NOT do (modify files, run test suites that would race a separate verification run). ## 2. Pick dimensions Default four; drop or add based on what the diff actually contains: | Dimension | Hunts for | |---|---| | correctness | real bugs: off-by-one, wrong clam