code-review

Solid

Review code with a sharp, encouraging voice - inline GitHub PR comments + a tight summary. Supports PR (default), pending changes, commit hash, and codebase modes. Encodes an opinionated review style: severity-prefixed, concise, actionable, no fluff. Pass `--refactor` for the local reuse/slop lens (never posts). For the owned deterministic `miucr` CLI (gated reviews, webhooks, MCP), use vd:miucr.

Code & Development 7 stars 0 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
30
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Code Review This skill **reviews and reports** - it never implements fixes. If a fix is obvious and one-line, mention it in the comment as a suggestion; hand the actual work back to `vd:cook` / `vd:fix`. Landing the branch afterwards is `vd:ship`. > **Codex runtime:** this file uses Claude-Code tooling (`AskUserQuestion`, `Task(Explore)` subagents). Under `codex exec` use the self-contained `codex-review.md` in this skill dir instead; per-site fallbacks below also apply. ## Modes Auto-detect from arguments. Ambiguous or empty → `AskUserQuestion` (Claude Code; plain-text question elsewhere). | Argument | Mode | Source of diff | |---|---|---| | `#123`, `123`, or GitHub PR URL | **PR** *(default & polished path)* | `gh pr diff` | | 7+ hex chars (`abc1234`) | **Commit** | `git show <sha>` | | `--pending` | **Pending** | `git diff` (staged + unstaged) | | `codebase` | **Codebase** | Broad scan via subagents | | *(none, recent changes in context)* | **Recent** | Whatever was just edited | Flags: - `--dry-run` - print the review payload, do NOT post to GitHub (PR mode only) - `--post` - opposite default; force posting even if other flags would skip - `--no-inline` - skip inline comments, post only the top-level summary - `--auto` - non-interactive, default answers, no prompts - `--ultra` - adversarial review via a dynamic workflow: every finding is independently refuted before it ships (see [Ultra mode](#ultra-mode--adversarial-workflow)). Higher token cost; use for high-sta...

Details

Author
vanducng
Repository
vanducng/skills
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

code-refactor-review

Review a diff for reuse, composition, codebase consistency, and slop - the 'does this fit the codebase' lens rather than 'is it correct'. Local and report-only by default; never posts to GitHub. Triggers: 'refactor review', 'is this slop', 'did we reinvent something that exists', 'does this fit the codebase', 'review for reuse', 'check composition'.

7 Updated today
vanducng
Code & Development Listed

code-review

Use when the user wants a code review of a branch, PR, MR, or working diff against its acceptance criteria and declared scope, in whatever form they take in this repo. Triggers on "review my branch", "review this PR", "check this diff before I raise it", "is this ready to merge". Works with any language, delivery process, or issue tracker. Produces a structured verdict with blocking, warning, and suggestion findings; writes no source changes. Do NOT use to address or fix review findings (code-review-fix), to implement work (implement), to publish a review to a provider as its reviewer (merge-request-review), to sign off completion of a larger body of work (validate), or to review rendered UI (ux-design-review).

2 Updated 3 weeks ago
carinyaparc
Code & Development Listed

code-review

Review code changes and report evidence-backed defects, actionable test gaps, and verification limits without editing. Use for uncommitted changes, path-filtered diffs, or pull-request diffs; use plan-review for implementation plans and fix-pr for GitHub review-comment remediation.

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
ValentinNikolaev