← ClaudeAtlas

journallisted

Write a focused engineering journal entry - retrospective on what just shipped or post-mortem on what just broke. Use after vd:ship, vd:cook, or right after an incident while context is fresh. Saves to the injected Journals path (personal dev log, not project docs).
vanducng/skills · ★ 8 · AI & Automation · score 81
Install: claude install-skill vanducng/skills
# Journal Journal **records** - one markdown file in the injected `Journals:` path. It does not redesign, retest, or roll back. If writing the entry surfaces a real bug - stop, kick to `vd:fix` or `vd:cook`, then come back to journal once the fact pattern stabilises. ## Modes | Mode | Voice | Use when | |---|---|---| | _(default)_ **retro** | Calm, structured. What shipped, what was tricky, what's next. | After `vd:ship`, `vd:cook`, end of session. | | `--incident` | Brutal-honest, 2am-developer voice. Root cause without euphemism. | A failure happened - outage, data loss, broken migration, repeated test failure, security finding. | | `--quick` | 3-5 lines, no formal structure. | Drive-by note - small fix, minor decision, surprising bit of context. Pairs with either voice. | ## Hard rules 1. **Specificity beats vibe.** Every entry names at least one concrete artifact: commit SHA, PR #, file path, error string, metric. "We had perf issues" is not a journal entry. 2. **Decision, not narration.** If a choice was made, name the alternatives that lost and why. Otherwise the future reader can't reverse-engineer the call. 3. **Brutal in `--incident`, not performative.** Honesty about root cause is the point - not theatrics. "We shipped without testing the migration" beats both "an oversight occurred" *and* "this is a fucking disaster". 4. **No new design decisions.** Journal records what already happened. New decisions belong in `vd:brainstorm` or `vd:plan`. 5. **One file per e