← ClaudeAtlas

dxkit-evaluatelisted

Run dxkit's zero-write trial — replay a repo's recent merged changes through the deterministic gate and report what it would have blocked and what enabling dxkit costs, without writing anything to the repo. Use when the user asks "would dxkit help here", "try dxkit on this repo", "what would dxkit have caught", "is dxkit worth enabling", or wants to evaluate dxkit before installing it.
vyuh-labs/dxkit · ★ 10 · Code & Development · score 72
Install: claude install-skill vyuh-labs/dxkit
# dxkit-evaluate This skill answers the pre-adoption question honestly: **what would dxkit's gate have done on this repo's real history, and at what cost?** It runs the real guardrail — the same code path the installed Stop-gate and CI gate use — against historical ref pairs, in disposable temp worktrees. Nothing is written to the repo: no `.dxkit/`, no baseline, no hooks. ## Running the trial The default replays the last 10 landings (merged PRs / squash commits) of the current branch: ```bash vyuh-dxkit evaluate # last 10 landings, security-only posture vyuh-dxkit evaluate --last-prs 20 # more history vyuh-dxkit evaluate --preset full-debt # also gate test gaps + quality regressions vyuh-dxkit evaluate --base origin/main~5 --head origin/main # one explicit range vyuh-dxkit evaluate --json # the versioned evidence document vyuh-dxkit evaluate --json --redact # shareable: file paths + lines stripped ``` ## Reading the result - **Blocked landings** list the exact net-new findings the gate would have returned for repair. Dependency findings on old landings carry an anachronism note (advisories are current-day) — say so when summarizing. - **A clean replay is a positive result, not an empty one**: it means the repo's existing debt would be grandfathered and the gate would have stayed out of the way. Present it that way — the gate's value is blocking the regression that hasn't happened yet, and the trial just measu