fix-websitelisted

# Fix a website that looks AI-made > Reads an existing site, works out what is giving it away, and returns an ordered list of > things to change with the effort each one costs. > > The output is an **improvement plan**, not a rewrite. Find everything first, report it, then > fix only what is asked for. Auditing and fixing in one pass leaves a half-audited, > half-fixed page and no record of what was wrong. --- ## 0. What this checks Two layers, because a page can fail either way and they need different fixes. | Layer | What it catches | Where it comes from | |---|---|---| | **The thirty tells** | Specific giveaway patterns: gradient stripes, sparkle icons, fake testimonials, missing privacy policy | §4 | | **Design quality** | Weak hierarchy, broken hero, repeated layouts, no states, unreadable CTAs, absent dark mode | §3 | A site can pass every tell check and still look generated, because it has no hierarchy and eight identical sections. A site can be beautifully composed and still look generated, because the testimonials are invented and there is no privacy policy. Check both. **Verdict.** | Verdict | Condition | |---|---| | **FAIL** | Any Class A tell present, or any Class C requirement missing | | **OVER BUDGET** | A and C clean, but more than 4 Class B tells, or 2 from one family | | **NEEDS WORK** | Tells clean, but design-quality findings remain | | **PASS** | Tells clean, budget respected, no blocking quality findings | --- ## 1. Procedure ### Step 1: scope