invention-structuringlisted

> **Fallback（本整合包补充）**：若 `mcp__codex__codex` 不可用，跳过外部跨模型评审步骤并在产物中注明 "External review skipped"，或改按本包 `cross-model-review` 协议用零上下文新线程替代。本 skill 其余步骤照常执行，不得因缺少评审器而失败。 # Invention Structuring Structure the invention into a formal disclosure based on: **$ARGUMENTS** Adapted from the refinement pattern in `/research-refine` for patent invention decomposition. ## Constants - `REVIEWER_MODEL = gpt-5.6-sol` — External reviewer for invention decomposition validation - `MAX_REFINEMENT_ROUNDS = 3` — Maximum structuring iterations ## Inputs 1. Invention description from `$ARGUMENTS` 2. `patent/INVENTION_BRIEF.md` if exists 3. `patent/PRIOR_ART_REPORT.md` — prior art landscape 4. `patent/NOVELTY_ASSESSMENT.md` — novelty analysis ## Shared References Load `../shared-references/patent-writing-principles.md` for the Problem-Solution-Advantage framework and claimable subject matter guidelines. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Problem-Solution-Advantage Framework Structure the invention using the universal patent framework: **Technical Problem (要解决的技术问题)**: - Derived from prior art deficiencies identified in NOVELTY_ASSESSMENT.md - Must be a specific, technical problem (not a commercial or social problem) - Statement format: "The technical problem to be solved is how to [specific technical objective] given [specific technical constraint]." **Technical Solution (技术方案)**: - The invention's specific technical contribution - Focus on the mechanism, not the result - Must be described at a leve