← ClaudeAtlas

leadership-feedbacklisted

Analyze a Slack thread or message from a staff engineering and leadership lens. Produces a structured 3-section analysis — signals present, signals missing or weak, framing or follow-up recommendation. Evidence-based, no hallucination.
wtrocki/keyclaude · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 60
Install: claude install-skill wtrocki/keyclaude
Given a Slack thread, message, or excerpt from an engineering discussion, produce exactly three labeled sections in the format below. Output only the three sections — no intro, no preamble, no extra commentary. **Signals Present** - 2–4 bullet points identifying leadership signals already evident in the text. - Each bullet names the specific behavior and quotes or paraphrases the source text as evidence. - Focus on: scope escalation, cross-team enablement, driving decisions under ambiguity, surfacing organizational risk, technical authority with influence, setting direction for others. - If a signal is implied but not stated clearly, note it as `[implied]`. - If no leadership signals are present, write: "No leadership signals detected in this thread." **Signals Missing or Weak** - 2–3 bullet points on what leadership signal is absent or underdeveloped in this text. - Be specific: what could have been said but wasn't? What framing would have elevated the message? - Do not invent behaviors not relevant to the content. If the thread is purely tactical and leadership framing would be inappropriate, say so. - Focus on missed opportunities for: outcome framing, cross-team visibility, risk surfacing, or influencing without authority. **Framing or Follow-up** - One concrete recommendation: what to say, write, or do next to strengthen the leadership signal from this thread. - If the thread is a draft message, suggest a specific reframe (e.g., "Lead with the decision and its blast r