code-review

# Independent implementation review Review in independent-review mode with fresh eyes. Determine whether the actual implementation satisfies the approved contract safely; passing tests or plausible code alone is not sufficient. ## Purpose Review the actual implementation slice against approved authority and record a first-pass status with a safe, milestone-aware handoff. ## When to use Use after implementation handoff or for an explicit implementation-diff review. ## When not to use Do not use for proposal, spec, architecture, plan, final verification, or PR approval gates, and do not fix the reviewed target before recording findings. ## Workflow role - role_name: code-review - stage: review - upstream: implementation diff, review-requested milestone, governing artifacts, tests, and validation evidence - downstream: review-resolution, next implementation milestone, or final closeout sequence - summary: Perform independent implementation review, record the first-pass status and findings, close clean milestones, or route findings to review-resolution. - ownership: Write review evidence only. Workflow owns milestone and routing state; code-review does not edit implementation, plans, artifact settlement, or change-local routing. - must_not_claim: branch readiness, PR readiness, final verification, CI success, implementation fixes, or derived-artifact currency without separate owning evidence It must not edit implementation, the plan, artifact settlement, milestone state...