engineering-config-gradinglisted

(Proposal, unverified) Grade reproducibility-relevant engineering configuration items (hyperparameter search range, compute budget, seed handling, dataset splits) on a complete/partial/none scale, requiring the grader to first define what "complete" means per item before judging against it. Use this after study-design-tool-gate has dispatched an ML/CS engineering paper here; this is a graded QUALITY judgment, distinct from dual-column-self-check's binary Yes/No/NA self-audit checklists.
yogsoth-ai/paper-reading · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 78

Install: claude install-skill yogsoth-ai/paper-reading

# Engineering Config Grading (Proposal) Graded (not binary) reproducibility-config quality judgment. Fills the quality-judgment × engineering-metadata gap in the evaluative-stance × content-layer matrix (spec §2, matrix-generation phase). Per coverage-audit M14: an earlier draft folded this into dual-column-self-check via a value-domain toggle alone, which dropped the actual judgment-defining action (establishing what "complete" means) that distinguishes this from a binary checklist. ## Execution Subagent — spawned via spawn-agent skill. ## Proposal Status — Read Before Modifying No primary-source precedent (unlike NOS, which it's structurally modeled after but applies to a different content layer). Keep "(Proposal, unverified)" in the description until real usage validates the method.  ## Available SOPs | SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | spawn-agent | Spawn a customized CC subagent with full MCP tool access. |