literature-surveylisted

## Goal Write a literature survey whose claims are grounded in the argument graph. The tex and the graph are coupled throughout: each `\cite{ground_<N>}` in the tex links to a Ground node that holds the cited finding and its source paper. The graph is the quality mechanism — compile verifies the argument chain, verified Grounds confirm the evidence is in hand, and the citation linkage ensures the text faithfully represents what the papers say. There is no fixed workflow. Use the graph and the writing together however the work demands. **Done means**: - every Ground is `verified`; every Claim has status `supported`, `disputed`, or `refuted`; every Claim has passed `compile_arguments` - the tex is logically coherent: the argument flows, and each citation's surrounding text faithfully represents its Ground `proposed` is the initial state for Claims, not a resting place. ## How to use the Toulmin graph ### Extract the argument structure Two entry points are equally valid: **Framework-first**: formulate your research conclusions as Claims (`proposed`), then find literature to populate Grounds. Revise Claims based on what the evidence actually shows. **Evidence-first**: collect papers first. Each paper's relevant finding becomes a Ground. After accumulating Grounds, identify the pattern and formulate Claims. Node mappings: - `create_claim` — your independent synthesis conclusion; `proposed` initially, advances after `compile_arguments` passes and evidence is assessed as