review-introductionlisted

# /review-introduction Diagnose an introduction on all three dimensions the course defines: the information it carries, the way its ideas flow, and how it uses the literature. Report specific rewrites, not impressions. This reviews the writing, not the science. ## Before anything else 1. **Load the style rules.** Invoke `paper-writing-style` and read `references/human-voice.md`. 2. **Lock the language.** Use the language of the user's first message for the whole run. Any rewritten text is English. 3. **Get the material.** Read the introduction, and the rest of the manuscript if available: the results section is what tells you whether the introduction's promises are kept. Read the `.bib` file to audit the citations. ## Dimension 1: information Label each paragraph, and each sentence within it, with the movement it implements: | Label | Movement | | :--- | :--- | | `CONTEXT` | Broad field, its importance, terms and jargon defined | | `GAP` | What is unresolved, unexplained, contested, or too costly | | `SOTA` | Where the knowledge frontier is now | | `PURPOSE` | What this paper does | | `NONE` | Implements no movement. A finding in itself | Present it as a table of paragraph number, opening words, and label. Then report: 1. **Missing movements**, most serious first. A missing purpose is fatal. A missing gap makes the paper look unnecessary. A missing state of the art is the commonest omission and means the reader cannot tell whether anything was advance