ai-vendor-terms-reviewlisted

# AI Vendor Terms Review ## Purpose Produce a structured, attorney-ready review of an AI vendor's terms of service, API agreement, enterprise license, or acceptable use policy. The review focuses on the provisions that are materially different in AI contracts — rights to inputs and prompts, training data use, output ownership, IP indemnity, accuracy disclaimers, and model-change rights — while also flagging standard contract risk areas that apply with particular force in AI contexts. This skill produces draft legal work product for attorney review. It does not render a legal conclusion about whether any term is enforceable, whether the contract should be signed, or what any specific law requires. ## Use When - A team wants to adopt a new AI API, AI platform, or AI-enabled SaaS product and needs the legal terms reviewed. - An existing AI vendor agreement is up for renewal or the vendor has pushed updated terms. - A user asks "what are we giving up by signing this?" or "does this vendor own what we generate?" - Legal has received a vendor-side paper AI agreement and needs a structured risk review. - A vendor's acceptable use policy or model card terms need review before integration. ## Required Inputs - **Vendor agreement text**: The full text of the terms of service, API agreement, data processing agreement, and/or acceptable use policy — uploaded or pasted. Identify which document(s) are provided. - **Client's intended use**: A plain-language description of what the or