antitrust-risk-intakelisted

# Antitrust Risk Intake ## Purpose Produce a structured **draft for attorney review** for antitrust risk intake. Organize source-grounded facts, gaps, and review questions without legal conclusions. ## Use When - The user requests antitrust risk intake support. - Antitrust/competition issues need issue spotting and workflow organization. - Counsel needs a source-cited draft with explicit gaps and verification items. ## Required Inputs - **Jurisdiction(s) of competitive effect** — every country and, where relevant, state/province where the conduct has effects, or `[verify jurisdiction]`. The analysis follows the markets, not the parties' headquarters. - **Business sector and footprint** — industry, products/services, geographic reach, sales channels. Mark unknowns `unknown/not found/not provided/ambiguous`. - **Conduct description** — what is, was, or will be done. Each conduct item gets its own row, with: who, what, when, where, and (if multi-party) which counterparties. - **Counterparty competitive posture** — for each counterparty, the user's view of whether they are a direct competitor, potential competitor, customer, supplier, distributor, or unrelated. Multi-role flags allowed. - **Candidate conduct buckets the user suspects in scope** — horizontal collaboration, vertical restraint, information exchange, pricing-related conduct (RPM / MAP / MFN / loyalty), merger or acquisition, monopolization / abuse of dominance / unilateral conduct, trade association or standard