distribution-restraints-review

Solid

Use when a distribution, dealer, franchise, or marketplace program contains resale-price (RPM/MAP), territory or customer, online-sales, marketplace-ban, dual-pricing, exclusivity, or selective-distribution restraints, to produce a draft restraint inventory with per-jurisdiction character flags, ancillarity notes, and active-enforcement callouts for attorney review, without concluding enforceability, legality, or market power.

AI & Automation 15 stars 3 forks Updated 4 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
40
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Distribution Restraints Review ## Purpose Review distribution, dealer, franchise, reseller, and marketplace arrangements for vertical-restraint exposure — RPM and MAP programs, territory and customer restrictions, online-sales and marketplace limits, dual pricing, selective-distribution criteria, exclusivity, and tying — and organize a restraint inventory with per-jurisdiction character flags, ancillarity and rationale notes, and separate callouts for active-enforcement areas such as online-sales bans and dual pricing. The deliverable is **draft legal work product for attorney review**: restraint character (hardcore vs. rule-of-reason vs. mixed) is recorded as a question for counsel per jurisdiction, and the skill never concludes enforceability, legality, or market power. ## Use When - Sales or channel teams propose a MAP policy, a minimum-price program, or consequences for discounting dealers, and counsel needs it screened before rollout. - A distribution or dealer agreement restricts online sales, bans specified marketplaces, or applies different wholesale prices to online vs. offline volume. - A supplier wants to assign exclusive territories or customer classes to distributors, or to tighten selective-distribution criteria that may exclude online-only or discount dealers. - A dealer complaint, termination dispute, or threat letter puts an existing restraint program under scrutiny. - The company sells direct and through dealers in the same market, and the dual-distrib...

Details

Author
zgbrenner
Repository
zgbrenner/agentcounsel
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
4 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

exclusivity-mfn-pricing-review

Use when an agreement contains exclusivity, requirements, MFN/parity, loyalty-discount, rebate, or bundling provisions — a supply deal with a share-based rebate cliff, a platform demanding price parity — to produce a draft restraint classification, foreclosure-relevant facts table, MFN/parity matrix, and per-jurisdiction framework questions for attorney review, without concluding dominance, foreclosure, or legality.

15 Updated 4 days ago
zgbrenner
AI & Automation Solid

competitor-collaboration-review

Use when a proposed JV, co-development, co-marketing, joint purchasing, joint bidding, benchmarking, or standard-setting arrangement between actual or potential competitors needs antitrust screening, to produce a draft hardcore-restraint flag list, information-flow matrix, ancillarity questions, and per-jurisdiction safe-harbor questions for attorney review, without applying a safe harbor or approving the collaboration.

15 Updated 4 days ago
zgbrenner
AI & Automation Solid

antitrust-compliance-policy-review

Use when a company's antitrust compliance policy, competition code-of-conduct section, or training program needs a gap review — after an incident, an acquisition, a regulatory development, or as a periodic refresh — to produce a draft topic-coverage and jurisdiction-coverage matrix, training/reporting and dawn-raid gap assessments, and a drafting-suggestion list for attorney review, without attesting compliance or approving the policy.

15 Updated 4 days ago
zgbrenner