exclusivity-mfn-pricing-review

Solid

Use when an agreement contains exclusivity, requirements, MFN/parity, loyalty-discount, rebate, or bundling provisions — a supply deal with a share-based rebate cliff, a platform demanding price parity — to produce a draft restraint classification, foreclosure-relevant facts table, MFN/parity matrix, and per-jurisdiction framework questions for attorney review, without concluding dominance, foreclosure, or legality.

AI & Automation 15 stars 3 forks Updated 4 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
40
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Exclusivity MFN Pricing Review ## Purpose Review exclusivity, requirements, MFN/parity, loyalty-discount, rebate, and bundling provisions and organize the facts an attorney needs for a foreclosure and abuse-of-dominance assessment: a restraint classification with verbatim mechanics, a foreclosure-relevant facts table built only from user-supplied market data, an MFN/parity matrix distinguishing narrow from wide clauses, and per-jurisdiction framework questions. The deliverable is **draft legal work product for attorney review**: the skill records and asks — it never concludes dominance, market power, foreclosure, or legality. ## Use When - A sales team proposes an exclusive-dealing or requirements arrangement with a major customer, or a customer demands one from the company. - A platform or large buyer asks for an MFN or price-parity clause, and counsel needs the comparator scope (narrow vs. wide) and direction mapped. - A proposed rebate program conditions discounts on share-of-requirements, uses retroactive cliffs or thresholds, or bundles discounts across products. - A competitor complaint, customer pushback, or agency inquiry targets an existing exclusivity, MFN, or loyalty program. - A contract renewal reprices a loyalty or rebate structure and its triggers, thresholds, opt-outs, and termination mechanics need re-inventorying. - Counsel wants the foreclosure-relevant facts — covered share, contestable share, counterparties' alternatives, switching costs — organized...

Details

Author
zgbrenner
Repository
zgbrenner/agentcounsel
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
4 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

distribution-restraints-review

Use when a distribution, dealer, franchise, or marketplace program contains resale-price (RPM/MAP), territory or customer, online-sales, marketplace-ban, dual-pricing, exclusivity, or selective-distribution restraints, to produce a draft restraint inventory with per-jurisdiction character flags, ancillarity notes, and active-enforcement callouts for attorney review, without concluding enforceability, legality, or market power.

15 Updated 4 days ago
zgbrenner
AI & Automation Solid

competitor-collaboration-review

Use when a proposed JV, co-development, co-marketing, joint purchasing, joint bidding, benchmarking, or standard-setting arrangement between actual or potential competitors needs antitrust screening, to produce a draft hardcore-restraint flag list, information-flow matrix, ancillarity questions, and per-jurisdiction safe-harbor questions for attorney review, without applying a safe harbor or approving the collaboration.

15 Updated 4 days ago
zgbrenner
DevOps & Infrastructure Solid

pricing-algorithm-risk-triage

Use when the business deploys or evaluates a pricing recommender, dynamic-pricing engine, repricer, or pricing-as-a-service vendor — especially one that ingests competitor prices or serves competing customers — to produce a draft data-flow map, hub-and-spoke and signaling-risk flags, override/audit posture notes, and vendor-diligence questions for attorney review, without concluding concerted practice or approving deployment.

15 Updated 4 days ago
zgbrenner