information-sharing-clean-team-reviewlisted

# Information Sharing Clean Team Review ## Purpose Produce a structured **draft for attorney review** for information sharing clean team review. Organize source-grounded facts, gaps, and review questions without legal conclusions. ## Use When - The user requests information sharing clean team review support. - Antitrust/competition issues need issue spotting and workflow organization. - Counsel needs a source-cited draft with explicit gaps and verification items. ## Required Inputs - **Jurisdiction(s) of competitive effect** — every country and, where relevant, state/province where the parties operate and the information flow would have effects, or `[verify jurisdiction]`. - **Context for the exchange** — M&A diligence, JV, trade association, benchmarking, supply-chain reasonableness, settlement, or other. Mark unknowns `unknown/not found/not provided/ambiguous`. - **Parties' competitive posture** — actual / potential / no competition, per product market. - **Information categories proposed for exchange** — pricing (current, future, list, transaction), costs, customer-specific terms, capacity, output, market shares, wages/hiring, future plans, R&D roadmaps, bid information, customer-level data, sensitive supply terms. - **Data attributes per item** — granularity (individual vs. aggregated; identified vs. anonymized), age (historical vs. current/forward-looking), frequency, recency. - **Recipients per item** — clean-team-only? counsel-only? designated business individual