pricing-algorithm-risk-triagelisted

# Pricing Algorithm Risk Triage ## Purpose Produce a structured **draft for attorney review** for pricing algorithm risk triage. Organize source-grounded facts, gaps, and review questions without legal conclusions. ## Use When - The user requests pricing algorithm risk triage support. - Antitrust/competition issues need issue spotting and workflow organization. - Counsel needs a source-cited draft with explicit gaps and verification items. ## Required Inputs - **Jurisdiction(s) of competitive effect** — every country and, where relevant, state/province where the algorithm sets or influences prices, or `[verify jurisdiction]`. Algorithmic-pricing enforcement frameworks vary by regime. - **Algorithm role** — pricing recommendation engine / pricing decision engine / pricing analytics or comparator / dynamic pricing / personalization / revenue management. Mark unknowns `unknown/not found/not provided/ambiguous`. - **Vendor and user relationship** — third-party vendor or in-house? vendor's other customers; whether vendor serves direct competitors with similar inputs or outputs; vendor's data-access scope across customers. - **Data inputs** — own historical data only? own current data? public competitor prices (scraped or feed)? competitor private data shared via vendor? consortium or pool data? third-party signals (demand, weather, competitor inventory)? customer-specific data? - **Data outputs** — pricing recommendations, optimal prices, market signals, comparator views, cu