← ClaudeAtlas

packaging-low-context-worklisted

把活交给缺上下文的执行者时使用——便宜的 AI、子会话、外包、新来的同事(让 Codex 跑、派给子会话、带新人),以及决定哪���自己做哪些派出去时。按上下文依赖度切分:语义、边界、决策、验收留在懂的一侧;执行拆成五要素任务卡(负责/不负责/输入契约/输出物/验收),让称职的陌生人只凭卡片就能做对;回执必验收才算闭环。/ Use when handing work to an executor who lacks this session's context — a cheaper AI, a sub-session, a contractor, or a new teammate. High-context judgment stays; execution ships as self-contained work packages with explicit boundaries. Expensive context does thinking, cheap execution does legwork, receipts close the loop.
zhaiby-web/ai-coworker-skills · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 76
Install: claude install-skill zhaiby-web/ai-coworker-skills
# Packaging Low-Context Work ## Core Rule Context is the expensive asset. The side that holds it (this session, the product owner's head) does what only context can do — define semantics, set boundaries, make judgment calls, write acceptance criteria. Everything else ships out as **work packages an executor can complete without understanding the whole project**. Never solve a context gap by making the executor "read everything first" — the long onboarding chain (讲解→理解→拆解→实现) is exactly the cost this skill deletes; solve it by packaging the context they need into the task itself. The economics corollary for AI executors: expensive-context sessions must not burn themselves on legwork. Reading long files end-to-end, sweeping directories, running investigations, collecting evidence — write a clear task (读什么、核什么、产出什么格式) and send it to a cheap executor; keep only judgment-critical excerpts for direct reading. ## What Stays vs. What Ships | Stays with context | Ships as packages | |---|---| | Object vocabulary, domain semantics, boundary judgments | Engineering skeletons, scaffolding, generic components | | Spec, contracts, acceptance criteria | Mock APIs, list/detail page frames, display components | | Decisions and trade-offs | Investigations with defined output format | | Receipt verification and integration | Evidence collection, file sweeps, mechanical transforms | Litmus test for shippability: **could a competent stranger complete this correctly using only the card?** No