chipfighter
UserWorkflow-agnostic guardrails for AI coding agents: spec sync + risk-triggered engineering discipline for Claude Code and Codex.
Categories
Indexed Skills (8)
brainstorming
Use before coding when requirements have multiple reasonable interpretations, approaches require tradeoffs, or mistakes would be costly (permissions/payments/data migration/public APIs/data structures/hard-to-revert changes). Clarify requirements and design one question at a time, then get approval before implementation. Do not trigger for a focused small change with a clear goal and approach, or for mechanical edits (copy/constants/config values).
code-review
Use when changes affect interactions across multiple modules, involve high-risk areas (authorization/authentication, payments/funds, data deletion/migration, public APIs/cross-service interfaces/security boundaries), or the user requests a review. Review in this order—correctness → requirements → security → simplicity → style. Verify feedback before acting; do not comply blindly or agree performatively. Unless the user asks, documentation-only changes, explicit config values, and mechanical renames do not trigger merely because of a PR or merge.
context-hygiene
Use when starting a project, reading project documentation or history, or resolving conflicts between documents. For current state, read only the latest documents designated by the project; do not proactively read archives; do not duplicate the spec; use long-term memory only for environment, people, and preferences not recorded in the repository.
git-flow
Use when creating a branch, using worktrees for parallel work, committing, or wrapping up. Covers branch naming, conventional commits, short-lived branches, worktree isolation, and final merge/cleanup.
spec-sync
Use in cross-session work when user-confirmed outcomes, non-goals, hard constraints, or acceptance criteria have not been written back to the current source of truth (spec), or reality conflicts with it enough that following it would be wrong; also use during wrap-up or handoff when a source of truth should exist but does not. Edit only the affected original wording; do not keep separate old and new versions. Do not trigger for work that can be completed within one session, local implementation details, verification against existing acceptance criteria, locating the source of truth, or ordinary documentation edits.
systematic-debugging
Use before proposing a permanent fix for bugs, test failures, or unexpected behavior with an unknown root cause—mandatory when symptoms are far from the cause, a prior fix failed, or the issue crosses components. Reproduce, trace backward to the root cause, fix once at the source, and add a regression test. Do not trigger for obvious errors whose message identifies the cause (syntax/typo/missing import); fix those directly.
tdd
Use before implementation when behavior can be verified by automated tests and regression coverage has clear value. For bugs with an unknown root cause, use systematic-debugging first, then return for red-green. Follow red-green-refactor—write a failing test first, add only enough code to pass it, then refactor. Do not trigger for documentation, configuration, copy-only, or styling changes with no testable behavior.
verify-before-done
Use before claiming "done", "fixed", "tested", or "it runs", and before committing or opening a PR or MR—no task is exempt. Accept only evidence gathered after the last relevant change and just sufficient to prove the claim; do not over-verify small changes.
Bio shown is the top-scored skill's repo description as a fallback — real GitHub bios land in a future update.