pantheon-org
OrganizationAudit skill against a 9 dimension framework - enhanced version of skill-validator
Categories
Indexed Skills (16)
code-quality-advisor
Evaluates code quality across a range of dimensions including readability, maintainability, and structural coherence. Provides actionable feedback to help developers improve their codebase through targeted suggestions and best practice guidance.
pr-style-checker
Analyzes pull request diffs and detects style issues in each commit. Does not apply to auto-generated migration files or vendored dependencies. Use before merging to catch regressions early in your pipeline config.
context-file
Create a new .context/ file (plan, finding, or analysis) with standard YAML frontmatter. Use when documenting a decision, writing an implementation plan, recording research findings, or capturing analysis output. DO NOT use for ephemeral notes, secrets storage, or skill remediation plans (use skill-auditor remediate instead). Triggers: 'create a plan', 'new finding', 'document this', 'write analysis', 'new context file', 'capture findings', 'draft a plan', 'record decision'.
context-index
Regenerate .context/index.yaml from all .context/**/*.md frontmatter, and validate all files carry standard YAML frontmatter. Use when the index is stale, files were added or removed, or the pre-commit hook blocks on missing frontmatter. DO NOT use to create new context files (use context-file skill instead), to edit index.yaml by hand, or as a substitute for fixing frontmatter issues at the source. Triggers: 'update context index', 'regenerate index', 'context index stale', 'sync context', 'what context files exist', 'frontmatter missing', 'index .context'.
adr-capture
Capture Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) from .context/ plans, findings, and analyses. Extracts binding decisions into numbered ADRs under docs/ADR/, maintains a machine-readable index, and validates coverage. Use when creating or reviewing context files that contain decisions. DO NOT use for observational findings without decisions, retroactive documentation of long-settled decisions, or inline comments. Triggers: 'capture decision', 'create ADR', 'document decision', 'architectural decision', 'record decision as ADR', 'extract decisions', 'ADR review', 'index ADRs', 'check ADR coverage'.
design-debate
Stress-test an unwritten idea or decision by spawning independent subagents in genuinely OPPOSING roles (advocate, skeptic, migration/risk) rather than complementary review lenses — grounded in real repo investigation, not assumption, and concluding in a synthesized verdict rather than a list of opinions. Use for "should we do X", "what are the pros and cons", "I need pushback", "collegial review", "second opinion on this decision" — BEFORE a plan exists. NOT for reviewing an already-written plan file (use plan-review) and NOT for refining a vague question through dialogue with the user (use socratic-method).
plan-create
Create .context/plans/*.md files with standard YAML frontmatter, phases/tasks/waves decomposition, and post-creation validation. Infers section conventions from existing plans in .context/plans/ to match the local style. Integrates with plan-review for a create → review → iterate loop. Triggers: 'create a plan', 'new plan', 'draft a plan', 'plan scaffold', 'write a plan'. Do NOT use for plans outside .context/plans/, ephemeral notes, or the main project SKILL.md.
plan-review
Review .context/plans/*.md files using 3 independent subagent reviewers: Technical (feasibility, gaps, soundness), Strategic (scope, alignment, priority), and Risk (blind spots, edge cases, failure modes). The skill FIRST asks the user which models to assign to each reviewer — presenting available options based on the user's environment (OpenCode Zen, Go, Claude Code, or BYOK). Each reviewer receives the same plan with a role-specific lens and returns structured feedback. The main agent consolidates all three perspectives. Triggers: 'review this plan', 'audit plan', 'plan review', 'check my plan', 'what's wrong with this plan', 'review all plans', 'plan quality check'. Do NOT use for plans not in .context/plans/, one-off notes, or external documents.
docs-check
Validate the GitHub Pages documentation site built by @docmd/core. Covers build verification, orphan detection, ADR index freshness, cross-reference integrity, and LLM output audit. Use when editing docs, after merging doc changes, before deploying, or when troubleshooting a broken site build. Do NOT use for content quality review (use markdown-authoring) or agent skill documentation review (use skill-quality-auditor). Triggers: 'check docs', 'build docs', 'verify site', 'docs audit', 'orphan detection', 'docmd check', 'preview docs', 'LLM output check', 'ADR index check', 'documentation validation'.
external-source-fit
Assess whether an external GitHub repo, file, project fits the skill-quality-auditor project: what it actually is (not what its name implies); whether it overlaps existing capability (D1-D9 scorers, validate, duplication, eval runner, helper skills); whether it belongs in the Go CLI versus a helper skill; what is worth learning from even a rejected source; whether the project needs it. Ends by writing a house-standard FINDING, flagging any binding decision for ADR capture. Use when someone links an external repo, file, project asking whether it fits, whether we can learn from it, whether we need it. Do NOT use for reviewing internal code (use review-changes), scoring a SKILL.md (use skill-quality-auditor), doing web research (use deep-research). Triggers: 'does this repo fit', 'evaluate this project', 'assess this external repo', 'would this fit our project', 'can we learn from', 'is this worth adopting', 'fit assessment', 'should we import', 'should we port this'.
guided-interview
Conduct a structured, one-question-at-a-time interview to explore a specific topic or decision — each question offers 3-4 concrete, mutually exclusive options plus a free-text path, and later questions adapt to prior answers rather than following a fixed script. Ends with a recap the user confirms before finalizing, and only then produces a synthesized answer or (when the interview clearly feeds downstream work) a written brief. NOT for open-ended ambiguity-surfacing (use socratic-method) or single-fact lookups.
pr-author
Create and maintain GitHub PRs with live descriptions — template discovery, intelligent filling, and lifecycle updates. Triggers on: PR, pull request, create PR, update PR description, draft PR, open PR, format PR, PR template, change request, re-request review, review feedback, force-push PR, PR ready for review.
session-reflection
Conduct a two-question session-end reflection to catch blind spots and under-investigated areas before concluding. The agent surfaces its lowest-confidence work items and identifies what the user might be missing, then offers to investigate. Based on a Reddit-post technique combining an LLM-suggested confidence audit with Sam Altman's blind-spot question. Do NOT trigger for brief single-answer queries, CI contexts, or in the middle of active work — only when a session appears to be concluding. Triggers: 'wrap up', 'we're done', 'conclude', 'session end', 'final review', 'before we go', 'sign off', 'that's all', 'anything else', 'finished', 'reflection', 'confidence check', 'blind spot', 'what are you missing', 'rate your confidence', 'review the session'.
socratic-method
Refine vague, complex, or high-stakes prompts through Socratic dialogue — surfaces hidden assumptions, probes reasoning, and iterates toward clarity before committing to an implementation. NOT for simple concrete tasks, debugging, or well-defined procedures.
skill-quality-auditor
Evaluate, score, and remediate agent skill collections using a 9-dimension quality framework (Knowledge Delta, Mindset, Anti-Patterns, Specification Compliance, Progressive Disclosure, Freedom Calibration, Pattern Recognition, Practical Usability, Eval Validation). Performs duplication detection, generates remediation plans with T-shirt sizing, enforces CI quality gates, validates artifact conventions, tracks score trends, and provides a native eval runner with LLM-as-judge (BYOK, provider-agnostic). Use when evaluating skill quality, auditing SKILL.md files, scoring agent skills, generating remediation plans, detecting duplicate skills, validating skill format, enforcing quality gates, optimizing for A-grade publication, comparing audit baselines, batch skill assessments, or checking skill registry compliance. Triggers: 'check my skills', 'skill audit', 'improve my SKILL.md', 'quality check', 'A-grade scoring', 'quality gates', 'eval validation', 'audit all skills', 'remediation plan', 'skill judge', 'dimens
input-validation-skill
Validates, sanitizes, normalizes user inputs before processing. Prevents injection attacks, data corruption, runtime errors in production. Enforces schema-driven validation at entry points with explicit rejection policies for malformed payloads.
Bio shown is the top-scored skill's repo description as a fallback — real GitHub bios land in a future update.