deep-review

Solid

Parallel competency-based code review. Launches independent Agent reviewers per competency (security, performance, architecture, database, concurrency, error-handling, frontend, testing), each with a focused checklist and isolated context. Synthesizes findings into unified report with FIX/DEFER/ACCEPT triage. Use when: "deep review", "thorough review", "parallel review", "review by competency", "full code review", or for large diffs (200+ lines) where /review may be too shallow. Complements /review (pre-landing) — this is for deep dives. Do NOT use just to orient in an unfamiliar codebase or get a structural symbol overview; use repo-map for that (this audits a concrete diff for defects, it is not a navigation map).

AI & Automation 138 stars 21 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 90/100

Stars 20%
71
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Deep Review — Parallel Competency-Based Code Review Inspired by Memento workflow engine's parallel review pattern. Philosophy: one focused expert per domain > one generalist checking everything. --- ## Step 0: Determine scope ```bash BASE=$(gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName 2>/dev/null || git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@refs/remotes/origin/@@' || echo "main") echo "BASE: $BASE" git fetch origin "$BASE" --quiet 2>/dev/null || true echo "=== DIFF STATS ===" git diff "origin/$BASE" --stat echo "=== CHANGED FILES ===" git diff "origin/$BASE" --name-only echo "=== DIFF SIZE ===" git diff "origin/$BASE" --shortstat ``` Store the BASE branch name and list of changed files. You'll need them in every subsequent step. If there is no diff, stop: "Nothing to review — no changes against $BASE." --- ## Step 1: Scoping — select relevant competencies Based on the changed files, select ONLY the competencies that are relevant. Do NOT run all 8 for a 3-file CSS change. ### Competency selection rules | Competency | Trigger files/patterns | |---|---| | **security** | auth, middleware, routes handling user input, env files, CORS, JWT, crypto, passwords, tokens, API keys | | **performance** | database queries, loops over collections, API endpoints, bundle config, image/asset handling, caching | | **architecture** | new files/modules, cross-module imports, service boundaries, DI patterns, >5 files changed | | **database** | migrations, schema c...

Details

Author
AnastasiyaW
Repository
AnastasiyaW/claude-code-config
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Python
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

deep-review

Use this skill before committing significant changes, after a refactor, or when you want a second opinion on a diff — not for auditing a third-party skill/plugin's safety before install (use /ievo:security-check for that). Structured 11-point gap-detection review of a diff before commit. Spawns a deep-reviewer subagent for independent eyes (fresh context, separate token budget). Catches issues that survive pre-commit hooks, linters, and test suites but surface in human PR review — completeness gaps, test/impl drift, dead code from partial refactors, naming/behaviour mismatch, doc-paraphrase drift, cross-file consistency, error-path coverage, API contract fidelity, security surface, concurrency/state, and leaked secrets. Supports scope modes — staged changes (default), working tree, or arbitrary git range.

0 Updated today
ievo-ai
Code & Development Listed

review

Run a comprehensive multi-perspective code review on recent changes. Also triggers on 'is this secure?', 'security review', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'could this be exploited?' for security-focused review.

0 Updated yesterday
lethilu4796
Code & Development Solid

review

Structured code review with parallel audit agents, confidence-scored triage, and optional auto-fix. Examines uncommitted changes, staged diffs, commit ranges, or specific paths. Produces a tiered report (MUST-FIX / RECOMMENDED / NIT) backed by evidence, then optionally applies fixes with verification.

6 Updated today
greglas75