codex-review
FeaturedGet an independent cross-model code review from OpenAI Codex (a different vendor's model) on the current review scope: branch diff plus staged, unstaged, and untracked working tree changes. A different training distribution has non-overlapping blind spots, so Codex catches spec ambiguity, missing edge cases, and fake tests that Claude's self-review cannot see. Use before merging, after a tricky change, or for a debug second opinion. Triggers: 'codex review', 'second opinion', 'cross review', 'outside voice', '让 codex 审', '找外部意见', '二审'.
Install
Quality Score: 94/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Ancienttwo
- Repository
- Ancienttwo/repo-harness
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
codex-review
Second-opinion review of the current diff via the Codex CLI, read-only. Use when you want an independent adversarial review of a diff from a different model before merging. Manual only. NOT a replacement for /multi-review or /validate; Codex never edits — findings are advisory and Claude applies any fixes.
codex-review
Get an independent cross-model code review from OpenAI Codex (via the codex MCP server) on the current changes or a given scope, then synthesize it with Claude's own review into one actionable report. Use when the user asks to review / double-check / get a second opinion on the current work, or invokes /codex-review.
codex-review
Cross-model second opinion from the OpenAI Codex CLI (a different model family), read-only, in two seams — (1) code review of the current diff; (2) plan-stage premise challenge of a design packet (refute / missing / alternative, never a design). Opt-in only — use ONLY when the user explicitly asks with "codex review", "cross-model review", "second opinion on this diff", "別モデルでレビュー", "プランを Codex に反証させて", "前提を別モデルで叩いて", or invokes /codex-review or /codex-review --plan <file>. NOT a default step of the implementation chain (自発発火しない), NOT for letting Codex write code or design (read-only, divergence only), and NOT a replacement for the in-Claude reviewers.