codex-review
FeaturedGet an independent cross-model code review from OpenAI Codex (a different vendor's model) on the current review scope: branch diff plus staged, unstaged, and untracked working tree changes. A different training distribution has non-overlapping blind spots, so Codex catches spec ambiguity, missing edge cases, and fake tests that Claude's self-review cannot see. Use before merging, after a tricky change, or for a debug second opinion. Triggers: 'codex review', 'second opinion', 'cross review', 'outside voice', '让 codex 审', '找外部意见', '二审'.
Install
Quality Score: 94/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Ancienttwo
- Repository
- Ancienttwo/repo-harness
- Created
- 6 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
codex-review
Second-opinion review of the current diff via the Codex CLI, read-only. Use when you want an independent adversarial review of a diff from a different model before merging. Manual only. NOT a replacement for /multi-review or /validate; Codex never edits — findings are advisory and Claude applies any fixes.
codex-review
Run an independent code review using the OpenAI Codex CLI in headless mode. Gets a second opinion from a different model family (the current Codex models) on recent changes, a PR, a commit, or the whole app — covering bugs, regressions, security, data consistency, UX/state bugs, performance risks, and testing gaps. Saves a severity-prioritised report to .jez/reviews/. Triggers: 'codex review', 'review with codex', 'independent code review', 'what does codex think', 'get codex to review'.
codex-review
Get an independent cross-model code review from OpenAI Codex (via the codex MCP server) on the current changes or a given scope, then synthesize it with Claude's own review into one actionable report. Use when the user asks to review / double-check / get a second opinion on the current work, or invokes /codex-review.