repo-harness-review

Solid

Reviews an existing repo-harness plan across product, engineering, design, and DevEx dimensions before implementation or release follow-through.

Code & Development 397 stars 27 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 90/100

Stars 20%
87
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
73
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# repo-harness-review Use this command when a plan exists and the user wants a review before implementation. ## Protocol 1. Confirm the working repo and locate the active or provided plan. 2. Run `bun scripts/inspect-project-state.ts --repo <repo> --format text` when available. 3. Select review dimensions from the plan and repo type: `product`, `eng`, `design`, and `devex`. 4. Report blocking issues first, then the minimal plan edits needed to clear them. ## Delegation Brief Evidence A file-coupled `contract-run` verifier scores PASS or FAIL strictly against the contract's `exit_criteria`, never a rubric it invents. When reviewing such a run, check that the worker's report carries the actual command evidence for each `exit_criteria` item, not just a claim that it passed. ## Failure Modes - If no plan exists, route to `repo-harness-plan` instead of reviewing guesses. - If the plan lacks scope, tests, or rollback, mark the review blocked. - If implementation has already started, review the diff through `repo-harness-check` or Waza `/check`. ## Boundaries - Does not edit files or implement the plan by default. - Product review checks whether the workflow should exist. - Engineering review checks architecture, data flow, edge cases, and tests. - Design review applies only when user-facing docs, prompts, or UI workflow surfaces are affected. - DevEx review checks discoverability, command routing, first-run path, and verification cost.

Details

Author
Ancienttwo
Repository
Ancienttwo/repo-harness
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category