review-paper

# Review-Paper Skill Scaffold and draft a **literature review** — narrative, scoping (PRISMA-ScR), or systematic (PRISMA 2020) — for medical / medical-AI research. This skill builds the structure, the required scope/non-overlap framing, the summary-table stubs, and the reporting-guideline wiring, then hands off to the existing QC skills. It is the review-article counterpart to `write-paper` (which targets original research); for *reviewing* someone else's review article, use `/peer-review` or `/self-review` (the RV1-RV9 probes). The structure follows established review-writing conventions; it is not derived from, and does not reproduce, any specific published review. ## Anti-Hallucination - **Never invent citations.** Every citekey must resolve to the project's verified `_src/refs.bib` (produced by `/search-lit` → `/lit-sync` → `/verify-refs`). If a claim needs a reference that is not yet in the library, leave a `[NEEDS-REF: claim]` marker and route it to `/search-lit`; do not fabricate a DOI, author, year, or citekey. - **Never invent data.** Summary-table cells (study, year, metric, finding) are filled only from sources the user supplies or that are verified; an unknown cell stays a placeholder. - **No recommendation-grade language without standing.** For a scoping review especially, the output maps the evidence — it does not issue clinical recommendations. - **Quality gate before hand-off:** the draft is not "done" until `/self-review` reports 0 fatal findin...