demand-first-review
FeaturedUse when reviewing a PR, API, IPC channel, endpoint, parameter, type, config, or architectural extension point that adds or expands shared surface area, especially when consumers are absent, exports are unused or speculative, existing consumers are hack-heavy, forward compatibility is claimed, or multiple similar APIs may express one demand.
Install
Quality Score: 90/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- CherryHQ
- Repository
- CherryHQ/cherry-studio
- Created
- 2 years ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- AGPL-3.0
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
api-design-review
Review an API contract (REST or GraphQL) before or while it is implemented, checking resource naming, HTTP semantics, status codes, error shape, pagination, versioning, idempotency, and backward compatibility, and producing concrete revisions rather than abstract advice. Use when designing new endpoints, changing an existing API's surface, or reviewing a PR that adds or modifies API routes.
public-api-design-review
Audit an existing or proposed public REST API surface as a checklist-driven design review - resource and URI naming, HTTP method and status-code correctness, field-naming consistency, pagination pattern choice, filtering/sorting/field-selection conventions, one consistent error envelope, and Hyrum's-Law backward-compatibility risk - every finding bucketed Must-change or Improvement against a cited rule, plus the standing review program (audience, lifecycle triggers, reviewer authority, linting, federation). Use whenever the user mentions an API design review, REST API consistency, endpoint naming, pagination style, or API design governance - even if they never say "design review". Do NOT use for GraphQL schemas - use samber/developer-platform-skills@public-graphql-api-design instead.
demand-recon
Decide whether a product direction is worth building. Six stages, escalating in cost: stages 0 through 3 are free and offline, a veto stops the run, and only surviving directions reach the multi-track investigation. Use when the user says "is this idea worth building", "validate this idea", "help me research this direction", "should I build X", "competitor research", "demand analysis", or the Chinese equivalents.