demand-first-review
SolidUse when reviewing a PR, API, IPC channel, endpoint, parameter, type, or config that adds new surface area — BEFORE commenting on implementation quality. Also use immediately when a review surfaces signals like "no consumers yet", "unused export", "speculative", "additive", "forward-compatible", or "for future use".
Install
Quality Score: 90/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- CherryHQ
- Repository
- CherryHQ/cherry-studio
- Created
- 2 years ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- AGPL-3.0
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
first-principles-review
Use when the user explicitly asks for first principles, first-principles review, Occam's razor, or when a complex decision has ambiguous goals, competing constraints, repeated fixes, fallback growth, duplicate owners, or architecture/product direction risk.
doubt-driven-review
Adversarial fresh-context review for non-trivial decisions before they stand. Use for production-impacting logic, security-sensitive changes, unfamiliar code, or high-blast-radius architecture choices.
review-work
Independent post-implementation review — an agent with no sunk-cost bias checks just-written code or an artifact against its requirements, then resolves the issues found (max 2 rounds). Use to verify a change before shipping, get a second opinion, or check what you missed; auto-triggers for security-sensitive and data-mutation code. Not for code refactoring (use clean-code) or decision analysis (use debate-agents).