agents-consilium

Solid

Query external AI agents (Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, native Grok Build, Gemini) for independent second opinions, multi-depth code review, and full-YOLO single-agent delegation. Two public modes via scripts/consilium: review (read-only ask/code) and delegate (exact agent, no sandbox). Use for architecture choices, security review, deep multi-stage review, or handing a whole task to one agent. Not for simple questions answerable from docs or the codebase.

AI & Automation 109 stars 8 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 87/100

Stars 20%
68
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Consilium v5: Multi-Agent Review & Delegation Query external AI agents for independent expert opinions, structured code review, or full-YOLO task delegation. Review modes stay read-only. Delegate hands the whole task to **exactly one** explicitly selected agent in the caller's CWD. ## Public CLI (only entrypoint) ```bash scripts/consilium review ask [...] scripts/consilium review code --depth basic|specialists|super|ultra [...] scripts/consilium delegate -a <exact-agent-id> [...] scripts/consilium --list-agents ``` Old public scripts (`consensus-query.sh`, `code-review.sh`, `superreview.sh`, `ultrareview.sh`, `*-query.sh`) were removed in v5. Internal modules live under `scripts/lib/`. ## Why this skill **Different frontier models see different things.** Parallel independent reviews surface issues and alternatives one model alone misses. Consilium keeps agents independent (no debate, no cross-contamination) and lets the caller adjudicate. ## Modes | Mode | Read/write | Purpose | |------|------------|---------| | `review ask` | read-only | Open-ended question → parallel opinions | | `review code --depth basic` | read-only | 2 specialists: security + correctness | | `review code --depth specialists` | read-only | 5 specialists | | `review code --depth super` | read-only | Multi-stage superreview + LLM judge | | `review code --depth ultra` | read-only | Multi-stage ultrareview + LLM judge | | `delegate -a <id>` | **full YOLO** | One agent implements the task in CWD | ...

Details

Author
CodeAlive-AI
Repository
CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

ai-consultants

Consult Gemini, Codex, Mistral Vibe, Cursor, Claude, Kimi, Qwen, MiniMax, GLM, Grok, and DeepSeek as external experts for coding questions. Automatically excludes the invoking agent from the panel to avoid self-consultation. Use when you have doubts about implementations, want a second opinion, need to choose between different approaches, or when explicitly requested with phrases like "ask the consultants", "what do the other models think", "compare solutions", "get expert opinions", "I'm not sure about this approach", "what would other models say". Make sure to consult this skill whenever the user is weighing trade-offs, comparing architectures, validating complex solutions, or wants multiple perspectives on any non-trivial coding decision. Do NOT use for simple questions that only need one model's answer or when you already have high confidence in a solution.

6 Updated 2 days ago
matteoscurati
Code & Development Listed

agent-collab-solo-review

Run one read-only review of the current diff through agent-collab (one provider turn). Use for a "second opinion", "cross-vendor review", or "have another model review my diff" when one independent reviewer is enough.

2 Updated today
lauriparviainen
AI & Automation Solid

review-work

Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work. Triggers: 'review work', 'review my work', 'review changes', 'QA my work', 'verify implementation', 'check my work', 'validate changes', 'post-implementation review'.

66,650 Updated today
code-yeongyu