agents-consilium
FeaturedRun external coding agents (Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, native Grok Build, Gemini) as independent reviewers, stateful repository researchers, or single-agent implementers. Use for multi-model opinions and code review, steerable Grok research, full-access delegation, long-running work, or reattaching to delegated runs. Not for simple questions answerable directly from docs or the current codebase.
Install
Quality Score: 87/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- CodeAlive-AI
- Repository
- CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development
- Created
- 8 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
consilium
Run a consilium - a structured multi-model review of a technical question or design decision. Independent reviewers (Claude, Codex, Open Code and others) each write a review of the same brief, arbiters merge them into a draft decision, and after the user confirms it an implementer makes the authorized changes and verifiers check them. Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a consilium, a multi-model review or a second opinion from several models; it sends project files to several model providers and can take many minutes.
second-agent
Get a second opinion, code review, or delegate a task (write code, fix a bug, refactor) to Gemini, opencode, Codex, Claude Code, Copilot, Qwen, Kilo, Antigravity (agy), Command Code (cmd), Cursor, or Kiro CLI. Covers generic requests ("a second opinion", "another perspective", "independent review", "cross-model review") and engine-named ones ("ask Gemini", "codex review", "use opencode", "have Cursor fix this", "Qwen's take", "ask Copilot", "agy review", "cmd review", "kilo's take", "ask kiro-cli", "Claude review"). Named engine → use it directly. Unnamed → ask once, with a recommended default.
code-review
Multi-agent code review with parallel specialized reviewers, architecture validation, challenge validation, and durable handling of previously decided findings. Use `rq` to request a review of diffs (defaults to main branch), `rs` to respond to findings and record intentional non-fix decisions beside the relevant code. Triggers on "review this", "review my code", "code review", "check for bugs", "audit this", when examining PRs, pull requests, branches, or diffs. Always asks user before applying fixes or adding decision comments.