code-review
SolidPerforms an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.
Install
Quality Score: 97/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Donchitos
- Repository
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
- Created
- 3 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 weeks ago
- Language
- Shell
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
code-review
Use when reviewing AI-generated code for architectural quality, design patterns, and engineering practices
design-review
Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.
code-review
Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code — or when they ask to make sure, verify, or validate that code follows good coding standards, is free of errors or bugs, has sufficient test coverage, or meets best practices, even if they never use the word "review." Triggers for any request to assess code quality, correctness, or security of specific files, directories, or the current branch. Also use when the user invokes /code-review directly. Works on git branches (reviewing changed files against the default branch) or on specified files and directories when git is not available. Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.
code-review-expert
Comprehensive code review expertise. Use when reviewing code, evaluating architecture, or assessing quality. Triggers on review, evaluate, assess, audit, code quality, best practices.
architecture-review
Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.