strategy

Solid

Run structured brainstorming sessions (divergent/convergent), improve prompts with 7-dimension framework, and apply decision frameworks (RICE, weighted scoring, first principles, pre-mortem).

AI & Automation 96 stars 12 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
66
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Strategy Structured thinking for brainstorming, prompt engineering, and decision making. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Intake & Framing Extract the user's core need and classify it into one of three tracks: | Track | Trigger | Output | |-------|---------|--------| | **Decision** | "Should I...", "Which option...", "Help me choose..." | Scored recommendation with rationale and runner-up tradeoff | | **Ideation** | "Brainstorm...", "Generate ideas for...", "What are ways to..." | Prioritized list of ideas with convergent selection | | **Clarity** | "How do I think about...", "Improve this prompt", "Reframe..." | Restructured framing, 7-dimension prompt, or first-principles breakdown | If the user's need spans multiple tracks, run them sequentially: Clarity → Ideation → Decision. ### Step 2: Select Framework For **Decision** track: Choose ICE if speed matters, Impact/Effort matrix if resources are constrained, First Principles if the problem feels stuck or assumed, Pre-Mortem if the decision is high-stakes and irreversible. For **Ideation** track: Start with brainwriting (quantity). If ideas stall, inject SCAMPER or reverse brainstorming. Never open with free association for groups of 3+ — dominant voices take over. For **Clarity** track: Run the 7-dimension prompt diagnosis. Identify which dimensions are weak (0-3 on a 1-10 scale). Rewrite the prompt addressing the weakest dimensions first. ### Step 3: Execute Framework Follow the framework protocol from its dedicated s...

Details

Author
EliasOulkadi
Repository
EliasOulkadi/shokunin
Created
1 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

prompt-architect

Analyzes and improves prompts using 27 research-backed frameworks across 7 intent categories. Use when a user wants to improve, rewrite, structure, or engineer a prompt — including requests like "help me write a better prompt", "improve this prompt", "what framework should I use", "make this prompt more effective", or any prompt engineering task. Recommends the right framework based on intent (create, transform, reason, critique, recover, clarify, agentic), asks targeted questions, and delivers a structured, high-quality result.

200 Updated 1 weeks ago
ckelsoe
AI & Automation Listed

prioritize

Brainstorms strategic solutions when the problem or goal is already clear — generates initiatives, force-ranks them, scores trade-offs with evidence-backed ICE, and draws a cut line with kill criteria. Use when you know the problem and need to decide what to build or pursue first. Not for diagnosing what the problem is (use diagnose) or engineering task lists (use breakdown-tasks). For numeric targets after prioritizing, see plan-funnel; for technical architecture of chosen initiatives, see architect-system.

11 Updated yesterday
hungv47
AI & Automation Listed

brainstorming

Generate 2-4 distinct approaches with trade-off analysis across simplicity, flexibility, performance, effort, and risk, driving collaborative decision-making before implementation. Use when evaluating alternatives before committing to an implementation strategy. Proactively suggest when the team defaults to the first idea without exploring competitors.

5 Updated 2 weeks ago
synaptiai