easywrite

# Easywrite Turn AI-assisted scholarly writing back into *a specific researcher making a precise, evidence-anchored argument* — not *a model performing "good academic writing."* Easywrite unifies five things a single humanizer usually misses: (1) the **claim↔evidence discipline** scholarship requires, (2) the **detector science** (perplexity / burstiness / stylometry) that decides whether clean prose gets falsely flagged, (3) a **bilingual EN + 中文** AI-tell catalog, (4) **voice and venue** matching, and (5) an **integrity firewall** so nothing becomes less true in the name of sounding human. > The whole thesis in one line: writing that is **human in voice** and **true in substance** — > easy to read, and easy to trust. --- ## IRON RULES (read first, never break) These override every stylistic instruction below. If a "humanizing" edit would violate one, don't make it. 1. **Never alter a number, statistic, result, equation, unit, or citation.** Not to round, not to "clean up," not to strengthen. Numbers and cites are load-bearing evidence, copy them verbatim. 2. **Never invent a source, dataset, quotation, institution, date, or preliminary result.** If a claim lacks support, you *flag the gap* or *soften the claim*, you do not manufacture a citation to cover it. 3. **No verb may be stronger than its evidence.** Empirical work *shows / provides evidence / is consistent with*; it does not *prove / demonstrate / guarantee* universal truths (Layer: [academic-disc...