paper-self-review

Featured

This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", "audit claims", "check overclaiming", "verify whether results support claims", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.

Code & Development 5,144 stars 416 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Paper Self-Review A systematic paper quality checking tool that helps researchers conduct comprehensive self-review before submission. ## Core Features ### 1. Structure Review Check whether all sections of the paper are complete and conform to academic standards: - Does the Abstract include problem, method, results, and contributions? - Does the Introduction clearly articulate research motivation and background? - Is the Method detailed enough to be reproducible? - Do the Results sufficiently support the conclusions? - Does the Discussion address limitations and future work? ### 2. Logic Consistency Check Verify the logical coherence of the paper: - Do research questions match the methodology? - Does the experimental design support the research hypotheses? - Are result interpretations reasonable? - Are conclusions supported by evidence? ### 3. Citation Completeness Check the completeness and accuracy of citations: - Are all citations present in the references? - Is the reference format consistent? - Are key related works cited? - Do citations accurately reflect the original content? ### 4. Research Claim Audit Check whether the paper's claims are supported by the available evidence: - Are the main claims supported by results, citations, or analysis artifacts? - Are speculative observations clearly marked as tentative? - Does the paper avoid stronger wording than the evidence allows? - Are negative results, limitations, and missing baselines presented honestly? - D...

Details

Author
Galaxy-Dawn
Repository
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

academic-paper-review

Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
thestratcore
Code & Development Listed

paper-revision-editor

Revise, copy-edit, line-edit, polish, tighten, or give editorial feedback on an academic paper section; make it clearer to non-specialists, less AI-sounding and more human to read; read a whole paper cold as its intended reader and report where it stops working; check cross-section consistency; cut a section toward a length limit; respond to reviewer comments; draft, improve, or tighten a response-to-reviewers letter; route number checks against the repository data and analysis pipeline, figure regeneration, and new analyses to the gated analyst lane (/paper:verify-numbers, /paper:figures, /paper:analyze), and citation or novelty checks to the gated scholar lane (/paper:scholar). Diagnoses logical flow, argumentation, exposition, narrative spine, copyediting, and reader experience while preserving voice, citations, and numerical claims. Not for drafting new sections from notes, citation formatting or BibTeX, LaTeX compilation, pure typo lists, or non-academic prose.

3 Updated 3 days ago
ipeirotis
Code & Development Solid

paper-review

Deep single-paper academic analysis — journal credibility, author profiling, reference verification, citation impact, and critical appraisal. Like a teaching hospital journal club report. Use this skill whenever the user wants to deeply review, evaluate, or dissect a single academic paper, prepare a journal club presentation, verify a paper's references, check an author's track record, or do any thorough paper-level analysis. Also trigger when the user says "review this paper", "深度評讀", "journal club", "論文評讀", "幫我看這篇", or provides a DOI/PMID asking for analysis. NOT for multi-paper systematic reviews or standalone evidence grading.

37 Updated 2 weeks ago
drpwchen