paper-self-review
FeaturedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", "audit claims", "check overclaiming", "verify whether results support claims", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.
Install
Quality Score: 96/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Galaxy-Dawn
- Repository
- Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
- Created
- 6 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
academic-paper-review
Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".
paper-revision-editor
Revise, copy-edit, line-edit, polish, tighten, or give editorial feedback on an academic paper section; make it clearer to non-specialists, less AI-sounding and more human to read; read a whole paper cold as its intended reader and report where it stops working; check cross-section consistency; cut a section toward a length limit; respond to reviewer comments; draft, improve, or tighten a response-to-reviewers letter; route number checks against the repository data and analysis pipeline, figure regeneration, and new analyses to the gated analyst lane (/paper:verify-numbers, /paper:figures, /paper:analyze), and citation or novelty checks to the gated scholar lane (/paper:scholar). Diagnoses logical flow, argumentation, exposition, narrative spine, copyediting, and reader experience while preserving voice, citations, and numerical claims. Not for drafting new sections from notes, citation formatting or BibTeX, LaTeX compilation, pure typo lists, or non-academic prose.
paper-review
Deep single-paper academic analysis — journal credibility, author profiling, reference verification, citation impact, and critical appraisal. Like a teaching hospital journal club report. Use this skill whenever the user wants to deeply review, evaluate, or dissect a single academic paper, prepare a journal club presentation, verify a paper's references, check an author's track record, or do any thorough paper-level analysis. Also trigger when the user says "review this paper", "深度評讀", "journal club", "論文評讀", "幫我看這篇", or provides a DOI/PMID asking for analysis. NOT for multi-paper systematic reviews or standalone evidence grading.