review-response

Solid

Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.

AI & Automation 4,293 stars 375 forks Updated 6 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Review Response A systematic review response workflow that helps researchers efficiently and professionally reply to reviewer comments. ## Core Features 1. **Review Analysis** - Parse and classify reviewer comments (Major/Minor/Typo/Misunderstanding) 2. **Response Strategy** - Develop response strategies for different comment types (Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment) 3. **Rebuttal Writing** - Write structured, professional rebuttal documents 4. **Tone Management** - Optimize tone to maintain professionalism, respect, and evidence-based arguments ## Workflow ``` Receive reviewer comments -> Parse and classify -> Develop strategy -> Write responses -> Tone check -> Final rebuttal ``` ## When to Use Use this skill when you need to: - "Help me write a rebuttal" - "How to respond to reviewer comments" - "Analyze these review comments" - "Develop a review response strategy" ## Usage Steps 1. **Provide reviewer comments** - Share the reviewer comments text or file with Claude 2. **Analysis and classification** - Claude automatically parses and classifies the comments 3. **Strategy recommendations** - Receive response strategy suggestions for each comment 4. **Write rebuttal** - Generate a structured rebuttal document based on the strategy 5. **Optimize tone** - Review and optimize the professionalism and politeness of responses ## Core Principles - **Professionalism** - Maintain an academically professional tone and expression - **Respectfulness** - Respect the reviewers...

Details

Author
Galaxy-Dawn
Repository
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
6 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

paper-rebuttal

Use this skill when the user wants to write a rebuttal, respond to reviewer comments, or prepare a rebuttal letter. Triggers include: "rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "review response", "rebuttal letter", "write rebuttal", "handle review comments". Also use when a paper is rejected and the user wants to plan resubmission.

2 Updated 2 weeks ago
charlotte-12s
AI & Automation Listed

reviewer-response

Draft a rigorous, polite, point-by-point response to reviewer comments on a journal or conference submission (R1 / R2 / R3 letters), plus the corresponding manuscript revisions. Categorizes each comment as concession / pushback / clarification needed / minor fix, drafts the response and the revision for each, and assembles a cover letter. Composes with `peer-review` (consume comments from a review output) and `manuscript-drafter` (revise prose using the manuscript's voice profile and academic register rules). Won't concede a point the data doesn't support; preserves framing where the reviewer misread; addresses every point. Trigger when: user mentions "respond to reviewers", "R1 response", "R2 response", "rebuttal", "address reviewer comments", "reviewer-response letter", "point-by-point response", "revision and resubmission", "response to reviewer 2", "cover letter to editor", or runs /respond.

4 Updated 1 weeks ago
Marazii
Data & Documents Listed

revise

Parse peer reviewer comments and generate a structured Response to Reviewers document with tracked manuscript changes. Classifies comments as MAJOR/MINOR/REBUTTAL, coordinates new analyses with /analyze-stats and /make-figures, and produces cover letter for editor.

145 Updated today
Aperivue