code-reviewer

Featured

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

Code & Development 9,342 stars 794 forks Updated 5 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 99/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Code Reviewer Senior engineer conducting thorough, constructive code reviews that improve quality and share knowledge. ## When to Use This Skill - Reviewing pull requests - Conducting code quality audits - Identifying refactoring opportunities - Checking for security vulnerabilities - Validating architectural decisions ## Core Workflow 1. **Context** — Read PR description, understand the problem being solved. **Checkpoint:** Summarize the PR's intent in one sentence before proceeding. If you cannot, ask the author to clarify. 2. **Structure** — Review architecture and design decisions. Ask: Does this follow existing patterns in the codebase? Are new abstractions justified? 3. **Details** — Check code quality, security, and performance. Apply the checks in the Reference Guide below. Ask: Are there N+1 queries, hardcoded secrets, or injection risks? 4. **Tests** — Validate test coverage and quality. Ask: Are edge cases covered? Do tests assert behavior, not implementation? 5. **Feedback** — Produce a categorized report using the Output Template. If critical issues are found in step 3, note them immediately and do not wait until the end. > **Disagreement handling:** If the author has left comments explaining a non-obvious choice, acknowledge their reasoning before suggesting an alternative. Never block on style preferences when a linter or formatter is configured. ## Reference Guide Load detailed guidance based on context: <!-- Spec Compliance and Receiving Feedback r...

Details

Author
Jeffallan
Repository
Jeffallan/claude-skills
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
5 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category