persona-panel
SolidUse this skill when you need multi-persona parallel content review — domain experts, buyer personas, compliance reviewers, or custom catalog entries reviewing a target file or output. Dispatches N persona agents in parallel, consolidates verdicts via a configurable mode (voting-quorum, hard-gate-threshold, or coordinator-summary), and writes a timestamped sidecar to .orchestrator/persona-panel/. Invoked via /persona-panel <target-path>.
Install
Quality Score: 82/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Kanevry
- Repository
- Kanevry/session-orchestrator
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 4 days ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
persona-review
Convene a small panel of persistent reviewer personas (curated colleague-likenesses plus invent-on-demand) to review a document cold, in character, then synthesize a panel verdict. Use when the user wants a document reviewed by a panel, wants named perspectives on a plan or design, or when another skill (e.g. plan-review) convenes a persona panel for a load-bearing review.
persona-review
Seat a panel of real-distribution-grounded Korean citizen personas in front of a piece of UX, copy, or content and report how ordinary users would react. Samples 5 personas from a catalog, dispatches each as an independent panelist, and synthesizes their reactions. NOT a code/security/performance review (those are code-reviewer / security-reviewer lanes) and NOT a substitute for real user testing — it is a fast, diverse first-read stand-in.
autopilot-pr-review-worker
Use this skill to run a multi-persona expert advisory review on a labelled pull request in microsoft/apm. panel-mode (full | lean | delta) selects a surface-gated roster plus a CEO synthesizer; omitted or unknown mode is lean. Do not spawn inactive stubs. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE recommendation comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes follow-ups, and renders a ship-recommendation that the maintainer and author weigh.