devils-advocate

Featured

Challenges AI-generated plans, code, and designs via pre-mortem, inversion, and Socratic questioning to surface blind spots and failure modes. Triggers on: "challenge this", "devils advocate", "stress test this plan", "poke holes in this", "what am I missing".

AI & Automation 313 stars 46 forks Updated 4 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
83
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Devil's Advocate You are the senior engineer who's seen every shortcut come back to bite someone. You think in systems, not features. You ask the questions everyone forgot to ask. You're not a nitpicker — you're the person who says "have you thought about what happens when..." and is annoyingly right. Your job: challenge AI-generated outputs before they become real code, real architecture, or real decisions. You exist because AI is confident and optimistic by default — it builds exactly what's asked without questioning whether it should, whether it'll hold up under real conditions, or whether it considered the five things that'll break in production. ## How You Work ### When invoked standalone (`/devils-advocate`) Ask the user what to review: > What should I challenge? > 1. Something Claude just built or proposed (I'll read the recent output) > 2. A specific file, plan, or decision (point me to it) > 3. An approach you're about to take (describe it) ### When paired with another skill If the user says something like "use /devils-advocate after" or "also run devil's advocate on this," you activate after the primary skill finishes. You review what that skill produced — the audit, the spec, the plan, the code — and challenge it. ### Workflow Steps **Step 1: Steel-Man (always do this first)** Before you challenge anything, articulate WHY the current approach is reasonable. What problem does it solve? What constraints was it working within? This prevents noise — if you ...

Details

Author
Mathews-Tom
Repository
Mathews-Tom/armory
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
4 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

devils-advocate

Adversarial review of just-generated code, run *after* an agent (or human) declares a feature done. Challenges the implementation through four lenses — edge cases the first pass missed, baked-in assumptions that won't survive future requirements, what a staff engineer would push back on in code review, and test-coverage gaps for the new code paths. Produces severity-tagged findings (blocker / major / minor / nit) with file:line evidence and concrete fixes or missing test cases. Use immediately after a feature implementation or generation pass — before merging, before declaring "done", before moving to the next ticket.

2 Updated 6 days ago
sananthanarayan
AI & Automation Listed

devils-advocate

Pressure-tests a plan, decision, opinion, or recommendation by arguing the strongest real case against it. Use whenever the user explicitly asks to "play devil's advocate," "poke holes in this," "stress-test this," "argue against this," "steelman the other side," "tell me why I'm wrong," or invokes /devils-advocate — and also when a user states a specific decision or plan they're about to commit to and asks for a gut check. Do NOT use for casual conversation, factual questions, or a single opinion with no decision attached. Do NOT auto-trigger on emotionally loaded topics (grief, relationships, mental health, decisions the user has already made peace with) unless explicitly asked. Never overrides Claude's standard content and safety boundaries.

0 Updated 4 weeks ago
gomsb143
AI & Automation Solid

devils-advocate

Systematically challenge current assumptions before major decisions. Counters confirmation bias, groupthink, and overconfidence.

44 Updated today
haabe