responsive-layout-reviewer

Solid

Reviews HTML/CSS or component code for responsive design issues across mobile, tablet, and desktop breakpoints.

Web & Frontend 9 stars 1 forks Updated 6 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 85/100

Stars 20%
33
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Responsive Layout Reviewer ## What this skill does This skill reviews HTML/CSS, Tailwind, or React component code for responsive design issues. It checks for layout problems at mobile (320–480px), tablet (768–1024px), and desktop (1280px+) breakpoints, identifies common mistakes like fixed widths, missing overflow handling, inaccessible touch targets, and viewport-breaking elements, and produces a specific list of issues with exact fixes for each. Use this during code review, before shipping a new component or page, or when a layout is broken on certain screen sizes and you need a systematic diagnosis. ## How to use ### Claude Code / Cline Copy this file to `.agents/skills/responsive-layout-reviewer/SKILL.md` in your project root. Then ask: - *"Use the Responsive Layout Reviewer skill on `src/components/ProductCard.tsx`."* - *"Review this CSS for responsive issues using the Responsive Layout Reviewer skill."* Provide the component file or the HTML/CSS to review. ### Cursor Add the instructions below to your `.cursorrules` or paste them into the Cursor AI pane before sharing the code to review. ### Codex Paste the HTML/CSS or component code and ask Codex to follow the instructions below. ## The Prompt / Instructions for the Agent When asked to review for responsive design issues, check every item in this checklist: ### Breakpoints to evaluate Unless the project uses a custom breakpoint system, evaluate at: - **Mobile**: 320px (small phone), 375px (iPhone stan...

Details

Author
Notysoty
Repository
Notysoty/openagentskills
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
6 days ago
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category