drift-detect
SolidUse when the user says "plan drift", asks whether the roadmap, plans, or docs still match the code, or is deciding what to rebuild when restarting a stalled project.
Install
Quality Score: 86/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- OutlineDriven
- Repository
- OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin
- Created
- 8 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
drift-detection
Use periodically (weekly, at release candidates, before major version bumps) to scan a codebase for cumulative drift that no per-commit gate catches. Complements docs-as-definition-of-done, which prevents drift from being introduced per commit; this skill surfaces drift that already happened despite per-commit gates.
drift-report
Use to check the shared library, the current wiki, and all registered projects for accumulated drift — un-indexed PDFs, scans without a text layer, PDF bloat, project-bib keywords not yet merged into the master, cross-project bibkey collisions, lint regressions from out-of-band edits. Wraps hooks/drift_check.py, the same state-triggered check that runs automatically at session start. Triggers on "drift report", "check everything", "was steht an", "prüf mal alles", "ist alles konsistent", "check the library". NOT wiki-lint (single-project structural lint — this composes it), NOT semantic-wiki-review (LLM content audit — this is deterministic only).
drift-check
Audit a set of related project documents for internal contradictions and drift from their stated mission, with a skeptical eye that distrusts suspiciously clean alignment. Use whenever the user points at multiple docs (spec, PLANNING.md, README, CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, system prompt, TASK tracker, ADRs) and asks "are these consistent", "do my docs agree", "has my spec drifted", "check alignment", "is my README in sync", "audit my project for consistency", or shares a self-alignment/audit report. Especially trigger when documents should agree on the same facts (tech stack, metrics, feature lists, naming, architecture, tone) and the task is finding where they silently diverge, or where identical copy-pasted claims masquerade as validation. Lead with the real state of alignment and the biggest contradiction, never a vanity score. For cross-document consistency and mission-drift within a project's own materials, not verifying external claims (use reality-check) or choosing between options (use a council skill).