food-review

# Food-Review — Multi-Reviewer Peer Review for Food & Nutrition Manuscripts Give the author the review a good food-science journal would return, from a **panel** rather than a single voice. Original work; architecture informed by open community peer-review skills (see the repo README Acknowledgements). ## Modes - **full** (default) — the whole panel: three domain reviewers + devil's advocate + format check, synthesized by the coordinator into an editorial decision. - **quick** — coordinator + one blended reviewer pass; a fast readiness verdict. - **methodology** — deep dive by `reviewer_methodology` only. - **re-review** — re-assess a revised manuscript against the prior reports and the author's response, verifying each point was addressed. ## Panel (dispatch via the Agent tool; reviewers run in parallel) 1. **`review_coordinator`** (editor-in-chief) — sets the target journal + scope, dispatches `knowledge_builder`, then the reviewers, synthesizes their reports, resolves disagreement, and issues the decision. 2. **`knowledge_builder`** — **runs first**: reads the manuscript's cited sources (Pathway A) and the field's key literature (Pathway B) into a shared **knowledge base** so the panel judges the science from knowledge, not impression. 3. **`reviewer_methodology`** — design, statistics, reproducibility, validation. 4. **`reviewer_domain`** — novelty, significance, scope fit, domain correctness (food/nutrition science). 5. **`reviewer_integrity`** — data & citation integ...