verify

Solid

Answer "is this shippable / done?" with evidence before a commit or PR — fires on "verify", "is this done", "ready to ship?", pre-commit or pre-PR. Part of the Agentsmith harness; runs the project's verify phases and never claims "passing" without showing the output (R5).

AI & Automation 255 stars 11 forks Updated 4 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
80
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
72
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Verify — evidence before "done" "Verified" is not a feeling; it's output you can point at. Never claim passing without showing it (R5 + verification-before-completion). ## When this fires "verify" / "is this done / shippable / ready to merge?" / just before a commit or PR. ## Fast path — if `./scripts/verify.sh` exists 1. Run `./scripts/verify.sh` (runs every phase in `.harness/verify.conf`, stops at the first failure). `--list` shows the phases; `--only <tag>` iterates just one. 2. On a failure: read the label + command it printed, explain in plain language what broke, and point at that phase's line in `.harness/verify.conf` to fix or refine. 3. Report the actual pass/fail output — not a summary of intent. ## Fallback — no runner or no conf 1. Say so plainly, and look at `.harness/verify.conf.example` for the intended phases. 2. Run the obvious checks for this project directly and show their output: build, test, lint, link/render check, a dry-run. For non-code work, "verify" = open the artifact and confirm it renders / the numbers reconcile / the links resolve. 3. If nothing is wired yet, propose the phases this project needs and offer to write `.harness/verify.conf` — but still run the checks by hand this time. ## Report State each check and its evidence: "build ok, 42 tests green, lint clean" — with the output, not "should pass". Anything skipped is "deferred: reason", never silence.

Details

Author
PromptPartner
Repository
PromptPartner/agentsmith
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
4 days ago
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category