council

Solid

Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never claims 'consensus' from a single model family.

AI & Automation 86 stars 26 forks Updated 3 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 87/100

Stars 20%
65
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# council ## Purpose One coordination primitive that gathers N INDEPENDENT perspectives for any skill needing debate or multi-view judgment. Detects installed AI CLIs → fans a question across distinct model families → degrades gracefully to subagents when no bridge exists → gates off-topic/malformed voices → normalizes claims → **arbitrates INLINE** (no separate arbiter skill — single producer→single consumer is YAGNI). Council's entire value proposition is *decorrelated* model bias — two different architectures independently reaching the same conclusion is signal; two instances of the same model agreeing is an echo. council refuses to launder the second case as the first. <HARD-GATE> If fewer than 2 distinct real `model_family` values answered (excluding `is_fallback` voices AND voices with `model_family: "unknown"` — unconfirmed wrapper-CLI backends, see `references/dispatch-protocol.md` §Detect), council MUST stamp the run `NO_DECORRELATION` and the Arbitrate step MUST NOT use consensus language ("voices agree", "consensus view", "the panel concludes"). Say what happened instead: "N subagents of the same model family produced overlapping output — treat as one perspective, not independent confirmation." </HARD-GATE> ## Triggers - Called by `adversary` — Step 0.6, mode=critique, for plans flagged high-risk/critical-path/expensive-to-reverse - Called by `review` — Step 1.6, mode=review, when blast radius is 50+ callers with a HIGH-severity change - Called by `brainstorm...

Details

Author
Rune-kit
Repository
Rune-kit/rune
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
3 weeks ago
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

council

Pressure-tests high-stakes engineering decisions through 5 advisors with distinct thinking styles — independent analysis, anonymous peer review, chairman synthesis. Use when the user says "council this", "run the council", "pressure-test", "stress-test", "red team this", or "devil's advocate" on a real engineering trade-off. Distinct from strategic-analysis — adds adversarial peer review for decisions where the user suspects their first instinct is biased.

0 Updated 5 days ago
emrecdr
AI & Automation Listed

konsilium

Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".

17 Updated 4 days ago
Sanexxxx777
AI & Automation Listed

council

Run a model-diverse subagent council to investigate the same problem from multiple perspectives, compare findings, and produce a final recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a council, second opinions, multiple agents/models to evaluate one question, parallel investigation, red-team/blue-team comparison, or help deciding between competing technical approaches.

422 Updated today
aiskillstore