design-submission-check

Featured

Audit a design-award submission package against the current official rules for a specific award cycle. Check required materials and technical constraints, cross-material facts and claims, rights and disclosure risks, and final submission readiness. Use when a user asks for a pre-submission check, compliance review, missing-material audit, consistency check, or final go/no-go decision. Do not use this skill to choose an award, retrieve winners, judge the design itself, rewrite the whole entry, or give a legal clearance opinion.

Web & Frontend 1,023 stars 155 forks Updated 1 months ago Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 87/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
75
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Design Submission Check ## Purpose Determine whether a concrete design-award submission package is complete, internally consistent, and ready to submit under the current official rules for one exact award, track, category, and cycle. Return one of three decisions: - `Ready`: no Blocker or Important findings remain. - `Conditionally ready`: no Blocker remains, but one or more Important findings require attention. - `Not ready`: at least one Blocker remains. ## Scope Boundary - Convert current official submission rules into a project-specific checklist. - Check required files, fields, declarations, and technical constraints. - Compare names, facts, claims, credits, metrics, and versions across materials. - Screen rights, permissions, confidentiality, personal-data, and disclosure risks. - Perform a final package-level audit and prioritize fixes. - Stop after the audit. Do not select the award, score design quality, redesign the project, or perform comprehensive copy-editing. Use `$design-award-match` before this skill when the award, track, or category has not been selected. Route design-quality questions to `design-evaluation` and substantive redesign or rewriting to `design-optimization` when those skills are available. ## Severity Model Read [references/checking-framework.md](references/checking-framework.md). Classify every finding: - `Blocker`: likely prevents submission, violates an explicit hard rule, invalidates eligibility, or leaves a mandatory item absent...

Details

Author
SeanJ1ang
Repository
SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
1 months ago
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Web & Frontend Featured

design-evaluation

Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report evidence confidence, and optionally shortlist works within separate maturity tracks. Use when a user asks to judge, score, critique, review, diagnose, batch-evaluate, or rank designs by evidence-aligned evaluation score. Do not use this skill to retrieve winners, choose an award, produce a redesign, audit submission-file compliance, simulate an official jury, or predict winning probability.

1,023 Updated 1 months ago
SeanJ1ang
Web & Frontend Featured

design-award-match

Match a design project to supported design-award programs, tracks, and entry categories; apply structural eligibility gates; verify current official rules; compare published criteria and cautiously described winner trends; and output fit, evidence confidence, and submission priority. Use when a user asks which award or category to enter, compares awards, or requests an award-fit analysis. Supports iF, iF Student, Red Dot Product, Red Dot Design Concept, IDEA, DIA, K-Design, GOOD DESIGN AWARD Japan, Core77, James Dyson, and EPDA. Do not use for winner retrieval alone, detailed submission-file compliance, general design evaluation, optimization, or winning-probability prediction.

1,023 Updated 1 months ago
SeanJ1ang
Web & Frontend Listed

design-system-adherence

Audits whether a finished artifact actually follows the design system it was supposed to follow. Takes a design system as the yardstick (a Claude Design bundle, a CSS token file, a stylesheet) plus one or more artifacts (PDF, PNG/JPG, HTML) and returns measured findings — colour, typography, contrast — each with computed severity, the evidence it rests on and a specific fix. It DIAGNOSES; it does not redesign, rewrite or produce corrected assets, and it refuses to run without a design system to measure against. Use it whenever someone asks "does this follow our design system?", "is this on brand?", "audit this deck against our tokens", "check these screens against the styleguide", "why does this look off?", "did they use our colours?", "is our brand consistent across these pieces?", "review this PDF for brand compliance", or shares a design system together with something made from it. Also triggers on "contrast check", "WCAG audit" and "accessibility check" when a stylesheet is supplied.

0 Updated 3 days ago
santiagocardonao