grad-paragraph
SolidWrite one survey-quality paragraph from evidence packs (tension → contrast → evaluation anchor → limitation). **Trigger**: grad paragraph, paragraph micro-structure, argument paragraph, 研究生段落, 论证段落, 对比段, 段落写作. **Use when**: you are drafting `sections/S*.md` (H3 body) and want subsection-specific, evidence-bounded prose instead of templates.
Install
Quality Score: 81/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- WILLOSCAR
- Repository
- WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
- Created
- 7 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- None
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
paper-draft
Paper 分段正文共写命令(段落正文初稿共写器)。当用户已有论文大纲(/paper-outline 产物或手写大纲)、要逐段展开正文、起草段落、写论文正文、把大纲要点展开成段,或说"帮我把这段引言写一下""这段正文怎么展开""基于大纲写一段方法""我有大纲了、想写正文"时使用——即使用户只说"帮我想想这段怎么写""这一段写不下去"也应使用。行为铁律:基于大纲要点与 literature/ 文献笔记起草段落初稿、每段尽量挂真实存在的锚点(无文献支撑标「⚠️ 未经文献支撑」、绝不编数据);段落取舍(接受/改写/自写/删)由用户逐段拍板;模仿用户已有的风格样本(只学风格不抄内容);确认前零落盘;产物如实披露"成句生成"级辅助(PRD 披露第三级)。不替用户一次性写整章/整篇、不编数据/结果、不抄用户过往论文内容。"直接帮我把���章写完别问""帮我编点数据凑结���"走三段式转化或硬拒绝。
global-reviewer
Global consistency review for survey drafts: terminology, cross-section coherence, and scope/citation hygiene. **Trigger**: global review, consistency check, coherence audit, 术语一致性, 全局回看, 章节呼应, 拷打 writer. **Use when**: Draft exists and you want a final evidence-first coherence pass before LaTeX/PDF.
draft-polisher
Audit-style editing pass for `output/DRAFT.md`: remove template boilerplate, improve coherence, and enforce citation anchoring. **Trigger**: polish draft, de-template, coherence pass, remove boilerplate, 润色, 去套话, 去重复, 统一术语. **Use when**: a first-pass draft exists but reads like scaffolding (repetition/ellipsis/template phrases) or needs a coherence pass before global review/LaTeX.