grad-paragraph

Solid

Write one survey-quality paragraph from evidence packs (tension → contrast → evaluation anchor → limitation). **Trigger**: grad paragraph, paragraph micro-structure, argument paragraph, 研究生段落, 论证段落, 对比段, 段落写作. **Use when**: you are drafting `sections/S*.md` (H3 body) and want subsection-specific, evidence-bounded prose instead of templates.

AI & Automation 498 stars 39 forks Updated today

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
90
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
0
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Grad Paragraph (survey paragraph micro-skill) Purpose: produce a **single paragraph** that reads like real survey prose, not “outline expansion”. This is a writing micro-skill you can apply repeatedly inside `subsection-writer` (per H3 file under `sections/`). ## Role cards (use explicitly) ### Argument Planner Mission: decide the paragraph’s tension/contrast/eval/limitation before writing. Do: - Write a 4-line plan (kept out of final prose). - Ensure planned sentences can be grounded in evidence/citations. Avoid: - Writing from headings or generic axis labels. ### Paragraph Author Mission: turn the plan into one content-bearing paragraph with embedded citations. Do: - Use explicit contrast markers (whereas/in contrast). - Include at least one evaluation anchor token (task/metric/constraint). - End with a limitation that changes interpretation. Avoid: - Narration and repeated template stems. ## Role prompt: Paragraph Author (argument move) ```text You are writing one paragraph of a technical survey. Your job is to perform one argument move under evidence: - tension/question (why this matters here) - explicit contrast (A vs B; not a list) - evaluation anchor (task/metric/constraint) - limitation (what breaks transfer or comparability) Style: - natural prose, content-bearing - no narration (“This paragraph surveys…”) - no repeated discourse stems across paragraphs Constraints: - do not invent facts or citations - embed citations inside the sentence that need...

Details

Author
WILLOSCAR
Repository
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
None

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

paper-draft

Paper 分段正文共写命令(段落正文初稿共写器)。当用户已有论文大纲(/paper-outline 产物或手写大纲)、要逐段展开正文、起草段落、写论文正文、把大纲要点展开成段,或说"帮我把这段引言写一下""这段正文怎么展开""基于大纲写一段方法""我有大纲了、想写正文"时使用——即使用户只说"帮我想想这段怎么写""这一段写不下去"也应使用。行为铁律:基于大纲要点与 literature/ 文献笔记起草段落初稿、每段尽量挂真实存在的锚点(无文献支撑标「⚠️ 未经文献支撑」、绝不编数据);段落取舍(接受/改写/自写/删)由用户逐段拍板;模仿用户已有的风格样本(只学风格不抄内容);确认前零落盘;产物如实披露"成句生成"级辅助(PRD 披露第三级)。不替用户一次性写整章/整篇、不编数据/结果、不抄用户过往论文内容。"直接帮我把���章写完别问""帮我编点数据凑结���"走三段式转化或硬拒绝。

21 Updated 2 weeks ago
cabbage2000-lab
Code & Development Solid

global-reviewer

Global consistency review for survey drafts: terminology, cross-section coherence, and scope/citation hygiene. **Trigger**: global review, consistency check, coherence audit, 术语一致性, 全局回看, 章节呼应, 拷打 writer. **Use when**: Draft exists and you want a final evidence-first coherence pass before LaTeX/PDF.

498 Updated today
WILLOSCAR
Data & Documents Solid

draft-polisher

Audit-style editing pass for `output/DRAFT.md`: remove template boilerplate, improve coherence, and enforce citation anchoring. **Trigger**: polish draft, de-template, coherence pass, remove boilerplate, 润色, 去套话, 去重复, 统一术语. **Use when**: a first-pass draft exists but reads like scaffolding (repetition/ellipsis/template phrases) or needs a coherence pass before global review/LaTeX.

498 Updated today
WILLOSCAR